Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Nagler: If we move the curb cut, are we losing a parking spot on the <br />street? <br />Amos: There's no designated striping in that area. It's unlikely that you'll lose a spot if <br />you're moving the curb. <br />Commissioner Allen: Okay, so that's where I come out on parking. And I know if we go <br />the parking way it impacts density and the layout, but then I come back to the one issue <br />that I'm really struggling with this on this whole project, and that is compatibility with the <br />neighborhood. I've been reading these design guidelines and thinking about them. New <br />construction needs to be especially sensitive to surrounding structures. There's a lot of <br />discussion about massing, about paying attention to what's there. I know this is an older <br />neighborhood and that doesn't mean we need to build single story homes. That's not <br />what we're trying to do. We're trying to upgrade a neighborhood, but I really, really think <br />that whether you call it a multi -use building or what, this building that's on a setback of <br />one foot that's 30 feet high and three - stories is just not a fit with this little neighborhood. <br />I asked Natalie how many projects have we approved that are 30 feet, three - stories and <br />a one -foot setback and there were none. I mean, we had a challenge with Mike's <br />project on Peters Street and you know, with needing a 20 foot setback; now those <br />buildings are a little taller but it was a 20 foot setback and Mike said to us the reason I'm <br />going 20 feet is I've done other projects that people have complained about because <br />they had an 8 or 10 foot setback and the 30 feet was a little overpowering around <br />smaller homes, and so I am fundamentally not feeling like I can find this project is <br />compatible today with this neighborhood at this massing and I wish I asked and I'm <br />sorry I didn't, and I'll bring up later but I think for some of these projects, story poles are <br />going to be critical; that sometimes you don't know how something's going to look until <br />it's built and anyway, so I couldn't find for this being compatible without me personally <br />seeing story poles and if I saw them I'm afraid it would be a problem. <br />Beaudin: Commissioner Allen, can I just ask? The one foot setback; is this the mixed <br />use building that's of concern? <br />Commissioner Allen: It's mainly the mixed use building, one foot on Bernal. You know, <br />and Bernal homes have setbacks; even the business building does, and I believe also <br />Augustine I think has a pretty narrow setback. All the other homes on Augustine are <br />required to have 15 feet. The building next door is 16 feet and I think this is less than <br />that. <br />Beaudin: I'm not going to dispute the ground level setback, but on Sheet A -1, there is a <br />one -foot setback and the first floor of the building is at that setback. The building <br />changes angles on the second floor and actually does step back and the roof does <br />come down at that corner and so where it does get taller there is the setback from the <br />Augustine frontage. So I wanted to share that corner with you so it's clear that it's not <br />30 feet straight up. <br />Commissioner Allen: I knew it wasn't straight up but I'm just still thinking it's still <br />massive and it starts at one foot. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 13, 2016 Page 24 of 38 <br />