My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 071316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 071316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:45:49 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:35:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
We've always tried to keep this curb cut over here. I told Mike this, if I could go straight <br />in here, I could get another space there, you know, a conventional —you come in and <br />have parking on both sides. From the tree, it'd actually line up and the drive would come <br />in here. And I think it would be very easy to then pick up that seventh space if that was <br />what the Commission felt was necessary. <br />Commissioner Nagler: I was thinking of something similar. If we were to allow that tree <br />to be removed, what kind of tree is it? <br />Ward: We wouldn't take it out. It's a big one and it really does some screening there <br />that's really pretty sweet. The arborist said it is really about how we handle the <br />pavement out in that area and that it's pervious and we don't excavate a lot to do it. It <br />would be easy to add a space to the right and still get a generous area around that tree. <br />Chair Ritter: Without removing the tree? <br />Ward: Yes, without taking it out. And then as far as the setbacks, I mean, we started this <br />with a PUD in mind where we could establish the setbacks. I know if we have to go to a <br />20 -foot setback, we became sort of a block building with parking in front. That's kind of <br />what started to happen in the first studies with Mike, and this corner is way too special <br />for that. <br />Commissioner Balch: So the metal is on two parts; the siding and the roof itself. Is there <br />an alternative siding you would propose that could still cause it to be broken up as you <br />were saying is needed? <br />Ward: On the base we might go from the metal siding to some kind of a Craftsmen <br />shingle, you know, where they do the wide and then the narrow. It's sort of a patterned <br />shape. It's a little more precise than putting a bunch of shingles on it, but it has a nice <br />look to it. I think that would fit well. I think we would still stain it so you go into the white <br />mode so it's not quite so ..... you know, I'm not trying to make it cartoonish.... <br />Commissioner Balch: And the metal siding as I tried to find on the plans, it's only on the <br />third story, correct? <br />Ward: Yes, it was just for an accent. It's not like that's the only material we have to use. <br />really agree with staff on the metal siding. You see a lot of it now. The old roofs on <br />churches were all copper roofs, and of course that's kind of a problem now with runoff, <br />but we've done rusting metal roofs quite a bit, Corten which is a nice product. It's kind of <br />a sheet metal and it could be galvanized in flat sheets, ribbed sheets, all kinds of things. <br />But again, we could find another material too. <br />Chair Ritter: Thank you Tim. Okay, we have three speaker cards. <br />Tom Zaro: My grandfather Jaquemar Zaro came over from Italy and he worked in <br />Remillard brick factory and he resided at that residence right there; 4790 Augustine <br />Street. The brick chimney came from the Remlillard Brick Factory. There's a little out <br />building there, it's all brick. All of that came from the Remillard Brick Factory. They've <br />been building next to it. They preserved the original house there and down the street <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 13, 2016 Page 16 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.