My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062216
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 062216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:44:44 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:33:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/22/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Balch: Are you preserving that it's a buffer zone still? I ask because it <br />seems to be exclusive to me. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Well, that's why I'm confused when you say it's a buffer zone. Is <br />it still a buffer zone if we allow up to 10 people in the backyard? <br />Commissioner Balch: I wasn't in that majority so I'm not going to argue your case. <br />Commissioner Allen: And that's where I was. I was that it was still a buffer zone with <br />10 people that are Masons in the backyard if I was making up once per month that I'd <br />say they should have a right to have 10 people in the backyard for lunch and not at <br />9PM. <br />Commissioner Nagler: May I respond? To use your analogy which I think is an <br />excellent one because the Millers and others are arguing that we're in a neighborhood <br />and therefore it ought to be considered as if it was another neighborhood property, we <br />wouldn't think to say, resident `x', you can only use your backyard once a month. So if <br />for example we say there could be no more than 5 people in the backyard at any one <br />time, then it sort of doesn't matter how often they are back there. <br />Commissioner Allen: I get your point. <br />Commissioner Balch: So to Commissioner O'Connor's point, if you're a strict prohibition <br />of a backyard, you've solved a lot of problems. <br />Commissioner Allen: You have. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: You've solved almost every problem because I don't even <br />think you have to have a conversation over Mason function and something commercial <br />going on if no one's using the backyard. They did commercial before and there was no <br />problem. <br />Commissioner Balch: Could I suggest a possible out? Could we do that but allow an <br />exception at the Director of Community Development? So for example, if the Masons <br />wanted to have a Mason event that staff felt was appropriate, they could petition for it <br />and it doesn't have to be a CUP amendment. <br />Commissioner Allen: I'm fine with that because I do see an enforcement issue of getting <br />into these little, you know, allowing a little bit. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: If you want solid doors I don't know what the attraction's going <br />to be, but I'd hate to put someone like Gerry on the spot here tonight because the <br />people who hold his position change. We've had several since I've been here and I <br />might put all of my confidence in Gerry, but what about his replacement someday — <br />sorry, but I mean I've known another Jerry, this Gerry, Brian and... <br />Commissioner Balch: But my argument would be similar to a special event permit for <br />example. I'm assuming the City has a process for evaluating special permits. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 36 of 56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.