My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062216
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 062216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:44:44 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:33:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/22/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
we're not going to count voices, I have a real problem. What if it's 10 and they're loud? <br />No use of the buffer zone. <br />Commissioner Balch: So if I may, I mentioned earlier in my comments that I'm familiar <br />with buffer zones specifically in the City of Pleasanton unfortunately and it seems from <br />the buffer zone that I'm familiar with that basically the use can be things like a parking <br />lot frankly. Buffer zones can be used for true, let's call them "passive activities ", and I <br />don't know if staff wants to weigh in, but that's why I have difficulty with a strict <br />prohibition. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: This one actually said that it could be used for a future <br />parking lot. <br />Commissioner Balch: I thought I saw that somewhere. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: But not for human use. They're not going to have a gathering <br />in their courtyard. <br />Commissioner Balch: Well, I think that's maybe where I'm hesitant to where we're going <br />because I'm trying to say that I could foresee a use that could be potentially a parking <br />lot, could be a passive use. I'll call it a passive use. So I could support a passive use <br />and not a, you know.... <br />Commissioner Nagler: And I could support the use as a gathering place of human <br />beings under some conditions. <br />Commissioner Balch: Have we heard from Herb? <br />Chair Ritter: I said I agree with Commissioner Allen and Commissioner Nagler. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Okay, so now the question is how do you enforce it? <br />Commissioner O'Connor: We haven't been enforcing the current CUP. <br />Chair Ritter. It seems like the door caused a big issue to start the backyard and maybe <br />we say that the door is an exit only door. <br />Commissioner Balch: So the door has a couple of options. The first was changing the <br />glass to sound proof glass. The second option raised by someone was changing it to a <br />solid door and separate from those issues, the third was the exit -only access. I'm fine <br />with that exit -only access. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: And I think the glass was one of those attractive nuisances. If <br />it's not attractive to walk out there and you're kind of isolated, it's not as desirable to go, <br />but we created that by putting in a glass door. So I agree it should be emergency <br />only /exit only. <br />Chair Ritter: That eliminates people going in and out of that door which creates the zone <br />to an open court a little bit. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 34 of 56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.