My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062216
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 062216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:44:44 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:33:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/22/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
We learned a lot from the citizens of Pleasanton while collecting the signatures. This is <br />a polarizing subject with both sides passionate about the proposal for a third Costco in <br />the Tri- Valley. We have heard great arguments from both camps; those that are for and <br />those that are against big box retail on Johnson Drive. I hope that the City Council and <br />the Planning Commission will come to see this as a benefit that it truly is and allow the <br />process to proceed rather than making it a political pawn. <br />I also hope the rumors about the City producing their own ballot initiative about the <br />JDEDZ is just that, a rumor. This single initiative should give you a good sense of what <br />people desire, whether they will want a Costco on Johnson Drive or they will not. What <br />we would like to see is the City heeding the will of the people who they have been <br />elected to serve by acting positively on the initiative in a speedy manner. We would <br />hope that you would try not to delay the vote until a costly special election in the spring <br />of 2017, but rather place it on the November ballot as soon as possible. Let's pursue the <br />easiest and most direct path, by putting the Johnson Drive Initiative on the ballot, you'll <br />find out exactly what Pleasanton really wants. Thank you for allowing me this platform <br />over the past few months. I look forward to working with you on getting the very best <br />solution for the JDEDZ and the residents of Pleasanton. Thank you very much. <br />4. REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />There were no revisions to the agenda. <br />5. CONSENT CALENDAR <br />Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved, or <br />adopted by one motion unless a request for removal for discussion or <br />explanation is received from the Planning Commission or a member of the public <br />by submitting a speaker card for that item. <br />There were no Consent Calendar items. <br />Noted Present: <br />Commissioner Nagler arrived and was noted present at 7:10 p.m. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARING AND OTHER MATTERS <br />a. UP- 77 -13, Pleasanton Masonic Center <br />Consideration of retention, modification, or revocation of a Conditional Use <br />Permit for the operation of the Pleasanton Masonic Center located at <br />3370 Hopyard Road. Zoning for the property is RM -2,500 (Multiple - Family <br />Residential) District. <br />Jenny Soo presented the staff report and described the scope, layout and key elements <br />of the proposal. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Maybe to start at the end first and the idea that assuming we do <br />adopt something that it has no precedential impact on a subsequent use permit for <br />potentially a new owner and whether or not that actually is so. I ask my fellow <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 3 of 56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.