My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052516
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 052516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:43:02 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:31:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/25/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Nagler: It really comes down to that ground floor about one building, <br />right? I mean, as far as where the conversation has at least gone between the staff and <br />applicant. <br />Beaudin: So we're in a position now where all ground floor office is not practical. It <br />hasn't happened and we're in a position now where we can get a strong office corner <br />and the possibility of, as Commissioner Nagler was mentioning, that residential unit <br />fronting the street, has the potential for flexible space on the ground floor, and not the <br />entire ground floor of that unit. So that's interesting to us and we think it meets the intent <br />of the Code. We're trying to keep that on the dash as we're looking ahead because we <br />all recognize that the existing Downtown Specific Plan is not functioning the way it <br />should for certain areas of the downtown. <br />Commissioner Balch: Can I just follow -up with you on that Gerry. I understand it comes <br />back to the parking question. Given the site constraints, if the second residence did go <br />as we're saying here, we'd be shy of potentially seven spaces or maybe less depending <br />on the square footage of that, correct? Am I interpreting that correctly? <br />Beaudin: That's the parking discussion that we need to have. This is a Planned Unit <br />Development application. The applicant has the ability to request different parking <br />requirements relative to the Code. We can, again, go back to the base zoning district <br />which would apply anywhere in town and talk about the amount of parking that would be <br />required for a commercial use like this. There is some possibility you could share the <br />parking behind the mixed use building for that second mixed use building in this <br />diagram. There are ways that you can play with the parking requirement if there's a <br />desire to do that and we could talk a little bit about that. <br />Chair Ritter: I think when we go through these, we might have questions. Is that okay? <br />Commissioner Allen: Could I ask one question that's not on here at this moment? It's <br />regarding RHNA. Could you just recap the implications of RHNA to add residences at <br />this point in time? Do we receive any credit? <br />Amos: It's not a part of our RHNA numbers because we've met all of the requirements <br />for it. Rezoning this and adding these residential units on to it won't apply to it. They <br />don't have to go through that process and it won't affect anything we have with those <br />requirements. <br />Commissioner Allen: So it doesn't help us meet our RHNA requirements. If it's built we <br />never get credit for it in terms of RHNA numbers. <br />Amos: Correct. <br />Chair Ritter: But it could help workforce housing because they're studios, correct? <br />Beaudin: Yes, and I think Natalie has answered your question pretty directly, but, I'll say <br />that there's a regional need for housing. We have folks coming to the podium from time <br />to time talking to us about the fact that they work at Workday and they cannot find a <br />place to live in town. So the RHNA is certainly one component that we're looking at, but <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 25, 2016 Page 15 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.