PC 051116 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Balch: May I follow up on one of the questions— Jenny, could you turn to the slide showing the site location with the lots in red outlined? To Nancy's question, so Lot 2 being as large as it is, I mean it is 2 part. The first question is the building envelope -are those set in the specific plan? Those are locked in? Soo: This slide gives you an idea of where the specific plan says it could go. That is what the mustard colored circle, the blob, designates. The proposal is for this outline in red to be the building envelope that contains everything inside for Lot 1 and this for Lot 2. So all of the development needs to be limited within those boundaries. Commissioner Balch: Okay, so Lot 2 begs in my view to be split into another lot. I know this is a north /south orientation. The southern portion where you can see the existing home there, the southern portion can't be lobbed off, correct? In going forward with this plan, the southern portion of this Lot 2 must stay and contain with the northern portion. Soo: Actually you can see here there is a number 2. That is in the specific plan. In this area you are only allowed to create 2 new lots, so this is it. If Mr. Berlogar later on would like to have additional lots, one or two or even more, Mr. Berlogar will come back asking for a specific plan amendment. Commissioner Balch: I see, so theoretically if Lot 2, given its girth of 15 acres approximately, wanted to be broken out further... Soo: It's a process, yes. Commissioner Balch: I don't know if that's where you're heading Commissioner Allen, but that was my question. Commissioner Allen: Thank you for asking. Are there any other lots within what's called Lot 22 on page 2 that will be coming forward? Soo: No. The 9 lots already happened. When we discussed PUD -84 two years ago on the other side, the specific plan allowed for 3, Mr. Berlogar applied for 2 and we approved the 2 and he gave up the 3`d lot so that one is gone. If he wanted any more it would require a specific plan amendment. Commissioner Allen: And then the 9 lots....? Soo: Are in the front. Commissioner Allen: So those are the ones that exist. They existed prior to PP. Soo: Yes, that's correct. Commissioner Allen: Thank you. Commissioner Nagler: Because that means in the aggregate, even if the applicant came back later and asked, he still won't penetrate PP because 9 of the lots predated it. Okay, got it. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 11, 2016 Page 7 of 12