My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 041316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 041316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:34:09 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:29:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
family situation make it so we would request that you strike the requirement for an <br />extension of the as- designed front porch. <br />Commissioner Nagler: If I could sir, just so I'm clear, the home you would like to build is <br />as presented to us, right? <br />Gagliardi: Yes sir. <br />Commissioner Nagler: And staff is suggesting that the front door be set back, right? <br />Gagliardi: Currently the front door is set back over seven feet and there is a covered <br />porch there that is 50 square feet. What they are saying is they want the porch to <br />extend more over the front of the house laterally. So they are saying the covered porch <br />as it stands is not sufficient and they would like to see it expanded. So we've talked to <br />our architects to see if there is a way we could compromise by extending the existing <br />front porch a few feet out. Staff replied that was insufficient and they would prefer a <br />more lateral front porch. <br />Commissioner Balch: Looking at the design, the laundry room is of one of those <br />windows we see on the left and then next to that looks to be a powder room. So you're <br />saying that area is not available to extend a porch laterally? <br />Gagliardi: Not without getting rid of the powder room. <br />Commissioner Balch: I apologize. Maybe I'm not being clear. If you come out towards <br />the street five feet and extend to the left, is that a possibility? <br />Gagliardi: We talked through that with our architect and he is one of the speakers who <br />can describe that in more detail about why that would not work with the way the roof is <br />aligned, but we have looked at that option. <br />Chair Ritter: Staff, can you explain? <br />Weinstein: Yes, let me clarify. We're absolutely not looking for any sort of change to the <br />square footage or the configuration of the interior of the house or any changes to the <br />backyard. We're simply asking for a porch to be extended out from the front of the <br />house. Mr. Gagliardi is correct —there is an existing entryway that is covered, it <br />comprises of about 50 square feet. Because of its orientation, it's sort of a long, narrow <br />corridor; it's substantially less square footage than a compact parking space for <br />instance. So we're looking for a porch similar to those in the vicinity that extend out to <br />the front of the house. The development guidelines that are proposed which staff is very <br />comfortable with, allows for a porch to extend into the front setback without, again, <br />affecting any of the rest of the house, so no changes to interior space and no changes <br />to the backyard. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So you want the porch to come out from where the front door <br />is across the living room? <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 13, 2016 Page 5 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.