My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 041316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 041316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:34:09 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:29:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Balch: I just want to mention that they are underway and people have <br />moved and the housing that's going to be added to Pleasanton for senior housing is just <br />outstanding. <br />Chair Ritter: I know there's a task force that's coming for the Downtown Specific Plan. <br />Do we need to assign anybody for those yet? <br />Weinstein: The Downtown Specific Plan process is getting started. We already have <br />been thinking conceptually about the scope of work for the DSP, but we'll be sort of <br />diving into that in a lot more detail in the coming weeks. That said, we're still in the <br />embryonic stage of getting the DSP up and running. I don't think we've identified for <br />sure that there will be a task force, but there's a really good chance that there will be. <br />It's hard to contemplate moving a DSP update forward without a task force. Originally <br />the DSP update was intended to be relatively focused, yet the more people we talk to <br />and the more we think about the DSP, the broader the scope of work is. So it's sort of <br />morphing into a bigger project than we originally thought and because it's a bigger <br />project, we'll probably want a task force to work on it. We will report back to you. <br />There's a really good chance that we'll be asking for volunteers from this Commission. <br />Chair Ritter: Would you mind, this is the staff report of March 23`d, Item 8.e. where <br />read all this from. If you could on the next report just put who is the primary and who is <br />the alternate next to each one of those so we can just keep track of it. It helps on the <br />report. <br />Weinstein: Sure. <br />b. Future Planning Calendar <br />Ritter: I just want to make a note, if you know you're going to be missing a meeting in <br />the near future, just let staff know so we make sure we have a quorum. <br />Weinstein: And just really quickly, what's up for the next Planning Commission meeting, <br />it's a short meeting. We have three items and the first is consideration of a new process <br />for looking at projects that require legislative changes, like General Plan Amendments <br />or Rezoning's. We're calling it the 'gatekeeper process' right now, but it's sort of a new <br />proposal for a preliminary evaluation of major changes for planning policies in the City, <br />so you'll be seeing a staff report for that pretty soon. The second project is one that <br />you've heard about before, the Irby Ranch project where Stanley and First meet, so <br />about 100 residential units on about a 15 -acre site with a non - profit residential <br />component for Sunflower Hill. And then the third project is a Conditional Use Permit for <br />a day care facility on Hopyard at Stoneridge. <br />Commissioner Balch: For staff, I have to check my participation on the Irby Ranch <br />project. I may need to recuse. <br />c. Actions of the City Council <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 13, 2016 Page 32 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.