My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 041316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 041316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:34:09 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:29:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Nagler: You're not really answering my question. <br />Rennels: The reality is, without doing what we are doing, we couldn't have built the <br />station so it's not like this parcel we're talking about tonight which is Workday it could <br />not have all been put in parking. <br />Commissioner Nagler: No, I appreciate that. I guess I'm asking system -wide, as a <br />matter.... <br />Chair Ritter: Let's bring it back.... <br />Commissioner Nagler: Okay, okay, fine. I'm just trying to figure out what the perspective <br />of the system is. Okay, so as it relates to this specific project, was it part of the <br />conversation in figuring out how to build out the Workday garage site to try and address <br />the inadequacy of parking for BART customers at this site? Was that ever part of the <br />conversation? <br />Rennels: It was discussed from the standpoint of enhanced access to this station and <br />that was how it was discussed. Given the magnitude of their contributions I want to call <br />it exactions that they are paying the shared police facility, the opening of the stairway, <br />the payment of the plaza, the payment along the westerly side to allow for <br />pedestrian /bicycle access there. The bottom line is that in allowing our substation to <br />continue to be there, that's a critical element, and building over that and the cost <br />associated with building over a 35 KV high utility line has cost and allowing for us to <br />have 24/7 access. The magnitude of what Workday has incurred to be able to build this <br />at some point in time having done this for 24 years as I indicated at BART, there is a <br />limit as to how much you can expect before they say, 'maybe we'll go elsewhere.' <br />Commissioner Nagler: No, it's a great project. It is a great project. I'm just trying to <br />address this one issue. So let me just ask you a final question and then I'm done. Can <br />you give me a sense of what the timing is on resolving or coming to some fruition the <br />conversation you're having with the Stoneridge Mall? <br />Rennels: That's separate from this transaction and it's in the initial stages of discussion. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Okay, thank you. <br />Chair Ritter: Okay, any more speaker cards? All right, I'll bring it back to Planning <br />Commission and staff. Thank you for your service to BART. If any Commissioners have <br />questions, or do we want to make a motion? <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Chair Ritter: And remember, this is a modification. We're not going to rehash old issues. <br />Commissioner Balch: So my general comment is that I think the modification is <br />outstanding. The redesign of the parking structure is outstanding. It looks a lot more <br />presentable. It obviously allows for more billboard space for Workday but not being too <br />egregious or imposing upon the traffic on 580. So in my opinion, I think all of the design <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 13, 2016 Page 28 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.