PC 041316 - Laserfiche WebLink

number, someone might come to us and give us a small number and then we're still coming back to ITE. That's our standard. The infrastructure that we anticipated in the General Plan uses those numbers as well based on the different office categories, and that's how we calculate our traffic impact fees so we look at where General Plan buildout will take us, and those improvements then go into a bucket, a big list. We tally it up and then assess a fee based on that and the Council has the ability to adjust that before they adopt it. So we're in the process of updating our fees at this point in time and we have a long list of traffic improvements we know need to be paid for and we're looking at them with a pretty consistent methodology not one by one. I don't have the number for you. There is a development agreement though for this project and that's not being opened up with this. Because it's a Major Modification but it's actually less square footage, I believe the traffic impact fees are actually locked in based on the prior development. This is an interesting circumstance because it's considered a Major Modification but there are a number of other agreements already in place for this project. Commissioner O'Connor: Gerry, correct me if I'm wrong too, but the analysis here on trips really doesn't take into account their proximity to BART, does it? I mean, our code is by building size and it doesn't matter if it's next to BART or if it's someplace else. Beaudin: That's right and we typically try and adjust for that with our analysis, but for traffic impact fee calculation purposes and things like that, we're using our standard methodology. Commissioner Nagler: As I understand the number of parking spaces that are being planned there are almost one -to -one as one form of relationship between the number of employees that Workday anticipates in these buildings and the number of parking spaces being created, right? So in other words, the plan doesn't anticipate people using public transportation and bicycling and walking and carpooling and whatever else, right? Otto: The parking for the site is using our normal code as the guide which is based on square footage and not employees, which is 1 per 300, so that is what the project is providing. It provides 304 square feet, but when proposing that, we did factor in the proximity to the BART station, the bus stop, and all the traffic demand program measures that the applicant is going to implement and we were comfortable with the parking ratio of 1:304. Commissioner Nagler: Just in the raw numbers of it, the number of employees' Workday projects having on the site when the project is completed as compared to the actual number of parking spaces that will exist. It's almost a one -to -one relationship, isn't it? Otto: Workday, in their building can anticipate potentially up to 2200 employees but we have five other buildings that are also using the overall parking that we're talking about —the roughly 3800 spaces that are being proposed. Commissioner Nagler: So once this project is built and all of the buildings are occupied, using the company's numbers because you can't know, right, so just taking their PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 13, 2016 Page 24 of 33