My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 030916
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 030916
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:28:45 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:21:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/9/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
O'Connor: I know you guys do a lot of work for a long time on some of these projects <br />before they even come to us or to a workshop. Is there a reason why if we're doing <br />agenda planned amendment type of item, why we wouldn't have that earlier than later <br />before staff jumps in and does many, many hours of work on some of these projects if <br />there's not support for a General Plan Amendment? <br />Beaudin: We're working on a process that we'll bring to you soon that deals with <br />legislative changes like GPAs and rezonings differently than other kinds of applications. <br />We don't really have a name for it yet, but the idea is that we would get early input on <br />those kinds of applications for exactly the reason you just described; a lot of staff time, <br />the community gets worked up, and if it's something ultimately that the community and <br />elected and appointed officials aren't going to support we want to know that early. The <br />developer needs to know that early. It's fair to everyone, so I would say in the next <br />couple of months you'll see a staff report dealing exactly with that. <br />What I would also say is that we've been working on a Community Development <br />Department update which deals not only with planning but transportation improvements. <br />It's on the City's website on the CDD website under the What's New section, and it <br />essentially summarizes development applications from pre - application through to <br />certificate of occupancy, so you'll be able to know who's working on that, what the <br />project's all about and there's a map of the last piece of that document so you can see <br />where it is in the City. It also summarizes traffic improvements that are happening, so <br />BART to Livermore, Hwy 84 expansion, some of the bike and ped plans in the list, it has <br />a citywide improvement so please check that out as well. We didn't put all new <br />stoplights, but we are going to have some new stoplights starting this summer at the <br />Amador High School up front, so that's on the list because we're buying poles for that <br />now and entering into agreements with the school district to cost -share some of the new <br />sidewalk, so we want people to know that's coming and the reasons for that. If you have <br />questions, there's a hot link in there and it will take you right to the project manager for <br />that so you can get more information. <br />Ritter: When we post the agenda on line, do we post the future planning calendar also? <br />I don't know if we want to say the day we're going to have them, but it might be good to <br />have that as the second page of the agenda posted. <br />Beaudin: We do that internally, but it's hard. Things come and go pretty quickly from our <br />plates. <br />Ritter: Well, just when you guys give us that form, could that be the second page of the <br />agenda? <br />Beaudin: It could be but if we get people all worked up about something that may not <br />make it, it might be a disservice. We'll work on it. I understand the comment and I think <br />it's really important to give people visibility on the work that we're doing. That's what the <br />CDD update is all about for me, but it certainly does not try to project the Planning <br />Commission agenda in any way so I'll have to think a little more about that one. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 9, 2016 Page 24 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.