PC 030916 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ritter: As long as there's not three of us there at once, we should be good. Also, the Trails Committee and the Heritage Tree Board, do we have any meetings on those that you guys have attended? O'Connor: Julie, a question, before we lose that. Can more than two of us attend a meeting if we are not participants? Harryman: Yes, you can observe, but you don't want to start talking about things. Just for perception, don't sit together. I learned from Sarah Hosterman, there is a Heritage Tree Board of Appeal meeting before your next Planning Commission meeting. There are two appeals so probably starting early, but I don't know the timing. Allen: A Bicycle Pedestrian Trails Update meeting was held last week. It was a rather short meeting. What's happening in the bicycle and pedestrian area is they are updating the strategic plan. They did one community workshop and got input. It was well attended at the library. There were 40 people which was much larger than they expected and they will be doing one or two more and we can let you know the dates if any of you might want to attend. They received a lot of participation. One thing that is sort of interesting is that they are testing three different pavement types for bicycles to use and they're doing that on the pathway that is on Santa Rita by where Nob Hill used to be and where the Walmart neighborhood market is. The trail that goes underneath Santa Rita, they've laid out and there are signs for three different types of pavement. The roughest one is probably the cheapest one to install and also that whole area is prone to erosion. The issue is cost and longevity. The best one is probably the most expensive to maintain, but they're asking people to test those out and if you view the sign you can then email the team to let them know which you found to be best, and they'll make a decision in the next year as to what kind of pavement to use for future bike paths. Ritter: One request I might ask is to move Reports for Meetings Attended from F up to A on the agenda. Adam? Could you move F up to A because I'd like to keep that as a priority. Weinstein: Sure. Allen: Did I miss what is on our agenda for next meeting? Weinstein: We have a consent item. It's a church project in Valley Business Park and we have the Ponderosa Project at the end of Rose Avenue. It's a 19 unit project. There's no rezoning needed or General Plan re- designation. Balch: Can you give us some sense of timing on the Irby Ranch application? Weinstein: We're simply waiting for a resubmittal from the applicant on that. We haven't gotten a complete set of plans from them for a while. The first plans were preliminary and the applicant has been working on revising them. We met with them a couple of times but not sure about the schedule. The revised submittal could come in a couple of weeks. It could be a month out or two months out as well. It will be a work session. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 9, 2016 Page 22 of 25