My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 011316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 011316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:27:43 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:19:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Allen: Just one follow up —how many acres just technically does the church need for the <br />church property and their parking lot and the trees that would be around that? <br />Houston: I don't have a topo but they have their 12 acres and I would say maybe <br />one -third of it is flat and so where the church is, and even if they wanted to expand to a <br />larger footprint, there may be 2 acres of that up there that is of reasonableness where <br />they could actually build something more on it. But they are primarily interested, and we <br />had some slides of what their vision is, which is to upgrade their facility on the flat part, <br />the parking lot and upgrading their current facility to make it something better. <br />Ritter: I just had one question. Are there any natural hiking trails up there from the <br />church down into the city or bike trails that you could see on any of the lots? <br />Houston: From the church? The upper part? <br />Ritter: Or even down through the residents' area. It doesn't sound like it. <br />Houston: The creek is the huge barrier and frankly, neighbors don't want people going <br />in the creek. But the barrier is the creek and it's actually a pretty steep creek and <br />prevents any type of real interaction. In past history, the church had come down and <br />there was a small picnic area back there, but really it wasn't feasible because it's a <br />steep climb down. <br />Ritter: Okay, thank you. So we'll close it and go to staff questions. Thank you. I guess <br />while we're on that, are there any road bikers that use that trail, so instead of a <br />sidewalk, put in a road biking lane option or is there not enough space? <br />Hagen: In addition to the bike lane? <br />Ritter: Instead of a sidewalk. I mean, as they start undergrounding with wires, like <br />Foothill Road, you stop a bike trail and start again. <br />Beaudin: Yeah, there's stopping and starting on Dublin Canyon as well and we've been <br />requiring bike lanes to be installed with projects as they come on line. So that would be <br />a requirement of this project. So there would be a road improvement and a pedestrian <br />improvement that would be separate consistent with the Complete Streets standards <br />that we have for the community. So, I guess what I would say in terms of the sidewalk <br />and tree removal, there's nothing that says that something like that couldn't meander or <br />there are other public access easements that could be designed to create the tree <br />preservation objectives that we might have for this project. So there are ways to <br />accommodate both the bike and pedestrian improvements that are required for <br />development applications. <br />Ritter: Okay, we'll get back to that. All right, so any more questions for staff? We'll just <br />go down the list. <br />O'Connor: So on this map - -I don't know if you have a pointer, can you kind of trace for <br />us where the creek actually runs? I understand it's behind Lots 2, 3 and 4, but I don't <br />know how it turns and where it goes. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 13, 2016 Page 14 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.