My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 120915
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 120915
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:59:12 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:55:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/9/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor noted that there is no alcohol provided by this use and <br />inquired if outside people who are renting space for weddings and conferences could <br />bring their own alcohol. <br />Mr. Weinstein deferred to the applicant to respond to that question. <br />Theodore Brandvold, Commercial Architecture: stated that they do not intend in this <br />project to allow alcohol even for weddings and other similar events which may use the <br />venue. He asked if the Commission wished to put any restriction on that. <br />Commissioner O'Connor replied that he was just curious and was not looking for a <br />restriction. <br />Commissioner Piper inquired if a particular type of permit is necessary to allow alcohol <br />to be served on the property. <br />Mr. Brandvold replied that it was his understanding that there is always the option for <br />them to come in for a specific event permit should they have an event that may exceed <br />either operating hours or noise restrictions. <br />Mr. Weinstein stated that, by omission, there is effectively a restriction on alcohol use as <br />part of this project. He explained that it is not part of the written application materials <br />and not part of the Conditions of Approval, and because it is not specifically identified, it <br />is not expected to occur on -site. He indicated that if there were ever a desire to have <br />alcohol at special events, the CUP would have to come back as essentially a modified <br />CUP. <br />Mr. Brandvold requested clarification that there is that possibility that if a party wanted to <br />have alcohol beverages as part of its event and the owners wanted to allow it, they <br />could come in for an event permit. <br />Mr. Weinstein clarified that it would not be an event permit in this case but a <br />modification to the CUP. <br />Mr. Brandvold inquired if they would have to go through a hearing. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that it would not necessarily be a full hearing. He explained that <br />there are ways to administratively process those applications, and staff would look at <br />those on a case -by -case basis. <br />Commissioner Ritter inquired if it would be the same process that the Veterans Hall has <br />when someone renting the facility wanted to serve alcoholic beverages. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that there are specific parameters in the CUP for this project for <br />numbers, special events, and frequency, and if there were any divergence from that, the <br />CUP would have to be revisited. He added that staff would look to modify the CUP as <br />opposed to having the owners go through and get a separate special event permit. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 9, 2015 Page 7 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.