My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 120915
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 120915
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:59:12 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:55:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/9/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor agreed that the City has let people off the hook before, and <br />that is why Downtown is in trouble today. <br />Commissioner Balch indicated that he is not amending his motion and that he is not <br />including the direction to remove one unit. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: <br />Commissioners Balch, Piper, and Ritter <br />NOES: <br />Commissioners Allen and O'Connor <br />ABSTAIN: <br />None <br />RECUSED: <br />None <br />ABSENT: <br />None <br />Resolution No. PC- 2015 -43 recommending approval of PUD -109 was entered and <br />adopted as motioned. <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW /ACTION /INFORMATION <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br />Mr. Weinstein advised that the item on the Pleasanton Masonic Center and the Millers <br />will come before the Commission in January 2016. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquire if the matter could be considered as a hearing rather <br />than as a work session to avoid having to consider it twice. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that staff is still working on the staff report right now in preparation <br />for that meeting. He indicated that staff is definitely thinking about the Commission's <br />suggestion in order to expedite things, but staff is also trying to reconcile that with staff's <br />need for more guidance. He noted that staff has not had the opportunity to actually <br />discuss the history of this matter with the members of this Commission all together. He <br />stated that staff is just as eager as the Commission is not to have too many hearings <br />about this; however, because this is a complicated decision - making process, staff also <br />wants to make sure that the history is vetted in the right format and that staff is getting <br />good guidance. He added that one of the options is to leave the Conditional Use Permit <br />(CUP) alone. <br />Chair Allen replied that she is comfortable with that as she believes all of the <br />Commissioners have said that they really do not feel like they know much about the <br />history. She added that they are open to provide early feedback to staff if that will <br />actually expedite the process. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 9, 2015 Page 37 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.