Laserfiche WebLink
a disservice to residents and land owners by not zoning the site correctly or getting the <br />right mix for that use, such that the proposed projects for the site have failed. He stated <br />that he agrees with the Commissioners regarding parking Downtown, the PDA, and <br />creating vibrancy in Downtown; but something that is going to work has be done in that <br />location because a dirt lot does not create vibrancy. He added that he understands <br />there is a parking study going on right now and that the City is putting a task force <br />together to come up with a parking plan. <br />Mr. Beaudin confirmed that it correct. He indicated that the City Council will get an <br />update next week on that parking work, and the Downtown parking strategy and <br />implementation plan will be ready by next spring. He explained that the City is looking <br />not only at where additional parking supply is needed but also how it is going to get <br />there. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that he believes this will help everyone. <br />Commissioner O'Connor agreed but stated that this block is going away and it cannot <br />be considered. <br />Chair Allen noted that there is a whole paragraph in the DTSP about top priority lots for <br />consideration. and this is one of them. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that is correct. He stated that this site is identified as a potential <br />public parking lot in the DTSP and is grouped in the category of parking lots that could <br />be developed pursuant to a special assessment district which, again, has not been <br />developed at this point. He noted that the site is also designated for Downtown <br />commercial uses as well. He added that the DTSP also identifies other sites that could <br />potentially be used for parking, such as a railroad corridor which actually has a <br />designated land use for public uses. He noted that there is some kind of distinction in <br />the DTSP between the special assessment parking areas and other parking areas that <br />could be used for public parking as well, and this particular site on Spring Street does <br />not have that special assessment designation. <br />Commissioner Piper commented that the property is not for sale and, therefore, cannot <br />be purchased for a parking lot. <br />Commissioner Balch inquired when the DTSP was authored. <br />Mr. Beaudin replied that was in 2002. <br />Commissioner Balch commented that the City did not acquire the land in 2010, that it <br />had the opportunity but passed. <br />Mr. Weinstein confirmed that the City never acquired the land and that it probably could <br />have acquired it for the right price. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that the property has been sold three times since 2002. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 9, 2015 Page 26 of 40 <br />