My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 120915
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 120915
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:59:12 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:55:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/9/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Knuppe thanked the Commission for its time tonight and asked the Commissions to <br />approve the project. <br />Jim Knuppe, Applicant, stated that he will do a first -class job. He indicated that the <br />buildings will not have windows looking into the side yards of the neighboring units and <br />that Ms. Cardinalli can have an solid eight -foot tall fence before the existing building is <br />demolished. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that it was his understanding that under the C -C zoning, <br />residential is allowed but is either restricted to or desired for the second story or above, <br />but not on the first floor. He inquired if this is a requirement or just a preference. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that what staff is operating off of the DTSP, the Downtown <br />Commercial District, which specifically calls for ground -floor commercial uses and <br />allows for residential uses to be on the second floor. <br />Chair Allen asked staff to share with the Commission what the parking survey says <br />about this area. <br />Mr. Luchini replied that according to the study, Spring Street is generally congested the <br />majority of the time, with 90- percent to 100 - percent occupancy during a weekday <br />evening on the first half of Spring Street going east from Main Street up to Railroad <br />Avenue, and then opens up pretty significantly. He added that Railroad Avenue itself is <br />showing capacity for on- street parking. <br />Chair Allen inquired what the survey says about Main Street right next door. <br />Mr. Luchini replied that Main Street is highly impacted with 90- percent to 100 - percent <br />occupancy during weekday evenings. <br />Chair Allen noted that this survey was done two years ago. She stated that the current <br />parking on Spring Street kind of illegally serves 10 -20 cars, and people park there <br />because it allows it as long as they are liable for any injury, for example, if they trip. <br />She added that the survey does not account for the fact that when a developer builds on <br />Spring Street, those 20 cars will need to move somewhere. <br />Chair Allen inquired what the potential maximum number of employees might be for <br />4,000 square feet of commercial, retail, and office on Spring Street. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that it varies, depending on the parameters of the businesses that <br />would relocate to the site. He indicated that generally speaking, it could be something <br />like one employee for every 300 square foot or so in a retail /commercial space, which <br />would amount to approximately 13 employees. <br />Chair Allen noted that there are four parking spots, and that does not count any clients <br />who might be visiting the financial planner or anything like that. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 9, 2015 Page 22 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.