My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111815
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 111815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:58:07 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:53:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/18/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
six more lanes on Johnson Drive. He noted that the $15 million to put that freeway <br />ramp on tells him that it is going to cost $20 million. He added that he knows how the <br />sales tax plans work because he has generated those plans for other cities, and he is <br />certain that the City has to do a plan for Costco that will give it back one percent of the <br />City's sales tax revenue until the City gets some kind of a plan back. He noted that the <br />City will get its money back for years, and it will take away a lot of money from its sales <br />tax revenue from small businesses that are in Pleasanton right now. He added that he <br />knows many businesses that have lost money when other large businesses come to a <br />city. He asked the Commission to make sure the City plans accordingly. <br />Jerry Sandbrink stated that he too wants to voice his concern over the redevelopment <br />plan or the rezoning plan for Johnson Drive for two major reasons: (1) The traffic is <br />going to be absolutely horrendous and will affect more on- and off -ramps than just the <br />one on Stoneridge Drive; it will go down Bernal Avenue and around the corner. (2) If a <br />big store like Costco comes in, there will be adverse effects to the small businesses in <br />the neighborhood. She pointed out that it is not just the "plus" that a Costco store would <br />generate; there are a lot of "minuses" for all the small businesses that will go out of <br />business. She noted that big -box stores do not spend their money in Pleasanton; they <br />ship them off to corporate wherever that happens to be. He added that, on the contrary, <br />small businesses spend their money here, they get involved in community affairs and <br />schools, and they are acutely aware of their businesses and how they affect the <br />community. <br />Don Maday, owner of a small consulting firm based here in Pleasanton, stated that he <br />also attended the neighborhood meeting last week on the Johnson Drive Economic <br />Development Zone and would like to share a few observations with the Commission. <br />He indicated that because this project will impact traffic Citywide and has a substantial <br />impact on local businesses, the City's notices and communications regarding the project <br />should be sent to all residents and businesses in Pleasanton. He noted that most <br />residents she has talked to so far do not know anything about the project, and when <br />they do learn about the magnitude of the project, they get very upset over the fact that <br />they have not been informed because they also want to have their say on how the <br />project impacts their community. <br />Mr. Maday stated that the EIR needs to be amended to include the impacts that big <br />stores like Costco, as proposed in the project, will have on existing Pleasanton small <br />businesses, and added that input from local business owners should be sought out and <br />included. She pointed out that while the project will certainly generate tax dollars, a <br />large portion of those tax dollars will come at the expense of existing local businesses. <br />Mr. Maday stated that increased traffic is by far the biggest concern raised in the EIR, <br />and it is very troubling that Caltrans is being relied on as much to provide most of the <br />traffic mitigation, yet Caltrans had given no commitment and there is no implementation <br />timeline that has been agreed to at this point. He stated that the City should not move <br />ahead with any phase of this project without having traffic mitigations already in place, <br />as adding 10,000 to 12,000 cars a day to City streets and highway entrances without <br />having that mitigation in place is just dangerous. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 18, 2015 Page 3 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.