Laserfiche WebLink
although staff is very sensitive to comments from the applicant's team that buildings <br />need to be occupied and that a vacant building does not enhance the Downtown. He <br />added that one of the costs essentially of this project is, as Mr. Luchini mentioned, <br />requiring a lot of legislative changes to policy documents. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired how this building could be re- occupied as a residence <br />if it lost its tenant; if the owner would have to come in and get a Conditional Use Permit <br />(CUP). <br />Mr. Weinstein said no; it would require a PUD modification, which is a pretty big step. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that there are a lot of offices down there that are vacant <br />right now, or when they go vacant, they stay vacant for quite a long time. <br />Commissioner Balch commented that the neighboring adjacent property is being <br />remodeled. <br />Chair Allen stated that in the business world, if there is a vacant retail space and it is a <br />slow economy, the rent drops and a hair salon or one that is sort of transitional that just <br />wants a temporary place is brought in. <br />Chair Allen stated that she would like to itemize the following issues for discussion by <br />the Commission: commercial versus residential in relation to the front house; parking; <br />building height; and the garage in front. <br />Parking <br />Chair Allen stated that she thinks there are five spaces, at a minimum, for which she <br />would like to require in -lieu parking fees, and she could even argue for seven: the <br />applicant is actually proposing to demolish two spaces; there are two existing on -site, <br />the existing garage and the space associated with the little white house; and the net of <br />three on- street parking spaces that are being lost. She stated that the project needs a <br />PUD and the project needs five spaces. She asked staff to confirm what the parking <br />demand need for the commercial space is, just using the standard methodology for <br />saying the commercial is "X" amount of square feet and it would expect to have four <br />cars. <br />Mr. Luchini replied that it would be four spaces for the approximately 1,200 square feet, <br />based on the standard of one parking space for every 300 square feet. <br />Chair Allen stated that one question asked when considering any commercial building is <br />how many people are going to visit, and based on the square footage of that property, <br />how many spots would be expected to be required; staff indicated that would be four <br />parking spots, and added to the three on- street parking spots lost to making space for <br />the driveways, would make seven parking spaces. <br />Commissioner Nagler inquired how many parking spaces currently exist on the street, <br />contiguous to this lot, that are unaffected by this construction and could be used for <br />commercial purpose. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 18, 2015 Page 18 of 34 <br />