My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111815
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 111815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:58:07 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:53:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/18/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Ritter referred to the commercial zoning of the main house and asked <br />Mr. Bower if they were asking that it also have the option of being residential. <br />Mr. Bowers replied that they would love to see that be retail, a restaurant, a wine bar, or <br />a coffee shop, but when the economy goes south, a residential use would give them the <br />flexibility and the option to get a short-term tenant in there for six months to a year. He <br />noted that the tenants they have been leasing to have been divorced single moms who <br />are transitional or people looking for temporary places in which to live while their home <br />in Ruby Hill is being remodeled. He added that putting an office user there could be a <br />three- to five -year deal, as opposed to the residential user, which would have the vitality <br />back there in nine months or a year. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Ritter asked staff for more information on the building that is being <br />remodeled right next door to this project. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that the building is a 1960's- or 1970's -era building that does not <br />relate well to the street and does not promote pedestrian vitality. He indicated that the <br />building is being renovated to be a little more pedestrian- centric to open up a little more <br />to the street. He noted that it is being designed to be more amenable to an actual retail <br />use as opposed to just an office use. <br />Commissioner Nagler asked staff to describe what is going on behind it. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that it is a single - family house. <br />Commissioner Balch asked what the height of the buildings are. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that the front - facing was an existing commercial /medical type of <br />building that needed some work done with parking, and the back was a long, 32 -foot <br />high house located on the west side of the property. <br />Commissioner O'Connor commented that if nothing was built on this vacant lot, it would <br />basically show through the front of the lot from Peters Avenue. <br />Commissioner Balch noted that on the other side of the big tall house is a big long <br />driveway with a fence between it and the commercial in the front. <br />Commissioner O'Connor asked staff is the current C -C zoning allows both residential <br />and commercial. <br />Mr. Luchini replied that it does to a degree, but the C -C zoning usually refers to <br />multi - family residential and not necessarily single - family. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if that could be something like the row of condos or <br />apartments. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 18, 2015 Page 15 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.