Laserfiche WebLink
Eric Pestana stated that he lives across from the project site and that the empty lot has <br />become somewhat of an eyesore and has been used for all sorts of different things. He <br />indicated that putting a project like this would add beauty to the Downtown, with the <br />front use of the house changing from rental to retail and the addition of a nice plaza. He <br />added that it would beautify that end of town and that he and his wife support the <br />project. <br />Emil Oxsen stated that he also lives across the street from the project site. He indicated <br />that he has no problem with the lot being developed, but his main concern is the height <br />and he disagrees with the three stories. He noted that he had to fight to build his house: <br />he had to construct a one story, and it had to be 1,200 square feet. He added that he <br />did not take away any off - street or on- street parking because his driveway was already <br />there. He inquired why the garages are not placed in the back like the houses next <br />door. He noted that there are three or four houses right next to him that are just like <br />that, except they are not three stories and are not 40 feet tall. He added that they are <br />putting a residential project in a commercial zoning, which would start a precedent and <br />create a problem going forward. <br />Michael Knuppe stated that he owns Kimberly Commons, the houses directly across the <br />street and the duplex on the corner. He indicated that he is also the owner and <br />developer of the Angela row houses at the other end of the street. He stated that he <br />knows the Peters Avenue corridor very well and thinks the proposed project would fit in <br />and be a great adjunct to that particular corner. He added that it is a great mixed -use <br />project and has merit; the architecture and the design are excellent. <br />Mr. Knuppe stated that his only minor concern is the three ugly garage doors facing <br />Peters Avenue. He indicated that there are no other garage doors facing anywhere on <br />Peters Avenue and proposed that the developer consider leaving the garages open so <br />that people do not put their stuff in the garages or park their cars out in the driveway. <br />He noted that when he first brought his project to the City and asked to put in garage <br />doors, he was told that garage doors were specifically denied on Peters Avenue. <br />Mike Carey stated that he has been a Pleasanton resident since 1973 and have lived <br />Downtown with his wife and three kids. He indicated that he lives, works, and own <br />property within a few doors of this project, so what is built on this site would personally <br />affect his family, his neighbors, and the Downtown community. He stated that they <br />worked really hard and closely with staff for over two years to create a project that they <br />are excited about and believe adds to the vibrancy and beauty of the Downtown. He <br />added that throughout the process, they have strictly followed the set of rules <br />established by the General Plan, the Downtown Specific Plan, the Downtown Design <br />Guidelines, and the zoning district. <br />Mr. Carey stated that the final product is consistent with surrounding properties. He <br />referred to a City map that he earlier handed to the Commissioners and noted the six <br />yellow highlights of approved and built high- density PUD's on Peters Avenue, and the <br />blue highlights of existing commercial /residential mixed -use sites. He referred to a one <br />of the blue highlights, Valley Plumbing, which is a long -time existing business and has <br />nine to eleven residential units behind it which have also been there for a long time. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 18, 2015 Page 12 of 34 <br />