Laserfiche WebLink
Chair Allen asked staff if there have been some precedent and comments where an <br />in -lieu parking fee has been required for the removal of on- street parking. <br />Mr. Weinstein said yes; in -lieu parking fees have been paid for the removal of on- street <br />parking. <br />Chair Allen noted that it was required for the independent, small houses right across <br />from the Chamber of Commerce building. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br />Bryan Bowers, Applicant, commended Mr. Luchini for a very good staff report. He <br />started that he is one of three partners involved in the proposed St. Mary's Street <br />project, which they are very excited about as it will add vitality to the Downtown. He <br />noted that all three partners have a background in commercial and residential real <br />estate; they all live in Pleasanton and love Pleasanton and the Downtown. He indicated <br />that they purchased the property at 377 St. Mary's Street about two years ago because <br />they believed it had the opportunity for an infill redevelopment project. He noted that it <br />is essentially a vacant lot sitting in the Downtown core that is begging to have <br />something done with it. <br />Mr. Bowers stated that when they purchased the property, they met with City staff and <br />talked about what they could do with the property when its zoning is "C -C" and "O." He <br />stated that staff indicated they could add onto the existing house, create additional <br />square footage, put a pool in the backyard, and make a bigger house; or they could <br />build an office building similar to the Chamber of Commerce building next door; or do a <br />mixed -use project which would be office on the first floor and residential on the second <br />floor. He indicated that they were not excited about those options and wanted to do a <br />project that just brought more vitality to the Downtown. <br />Mr. Bower stated that their proposal is a mixed -use project: residential in the back and <br />retail in the front with a plaza. He added that the house can be repurposed and the <br />plaza added on the approximately 2,700 square feet up front, which could provide <br />seating for about 60 people and be a nice amenity for the community. <br />Mr. Bower stated that they looked at all the policy documents, the General Plan, the <br />Downtown Specific Plan, and the Downtown Design Guidelines to see what kind of <br />project those guidelines call for, and they found at least a good 50 policy program line <br />items that perfectly match their proposed project. Those policies and program include <br />the following: <br />• General Plan Land Use Element Policy 12: "Preserve the character of the <br />Downtown while improving its retail and residential viability...." <br />• General Plan Land Use Element Program 12.3: "In the Downtown, implement <br />mixed -use development which incorporates higher density and affordable <br />residential units consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan, where feasible." <br />• General Plan Land Use Element, Program 12.4: "...allow mixed -use <br />development in the Downtown where residences are located behind commercial <br />uses." <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 18, 2015 Page 10 of 34 <br />