PC 102815 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Weinstein stated that staff got the word out about the meeting in as many ways as they could think of: notices were sent out to about 2,700 residents and occupants and surrounding neighborhoods; emails were sent to interested parties; it was posted on the City's website and Twitter account; it was published in the Contra Costa Times as a display ad; and an article was published in the PleasantonWeekly.com. He added that in full disclosure, it took longer to get the notices via mail to folks than staff had intended, so some people received their notices a little bit later. He noted that for the next meeting, staff will get the notices out much earlier and are working on sending out and getting word out about the meeting in different ways beyond the ones used at the last meeting because public involvement and public input are an important part of this process. Mr. Weinstein stated that because the meeting was on the night of the 49rs- Seahawks game, some people felt they had better things to do than come to a neighborhood meeting; however, it was impressive that over 40 people came out to the meeting. He indicated that staff gave a presentation on the project and the Draft Supplemental EIR, including its key findings. He pointed out that a lot of the people who attended ended up speaking as well, and the microphone was essentially just passed around after staff made their presentation. He noted that probably everybody who spoke at the meeting either seemed to be opposed to the project or had some significant concerns, so staff spent a lot of time hearing people's concerns and answering questions. Mr. Weinstein stated that the comments made generally echoed what staff had heard previously at the Draft SEIR comment meeting several weeks ago. He indicated that issues of economic impacts and retail leakage came up a lot, there were lots of questions about developer involvement in the process in terms of who was financing the studies being done, to what degree the City was promoting the project, and whether the project was developer- driven or City- driven. He added that there were definitely lots of questions about Costco and how that played into the project, as well as questions about traffic, air quality, and other environmental impacts of the project. Mr. Weinstein stated that staff is definitely taking public involvement seriously for this project and is planning another meeting, a community meeting on November 12th, to be held at Hart Middle School. He indicated that notices for that meeting went out today so people will get much more advanced notice than they did for the previous meeting, and staff is using the same forums and outreach as at the last meeting, but will add some more, such as having a press release and posting at the library and on the bulletin boards outside City Hall, and routing the notice to PUSD so word can get out to school parents. He indicated that the City is interested in having as many people as possible come to the meeting and make their concerns heard. He encouraged the Commissioners to talk to folks as well and let them know. Mr. Weinstein stated that along the same lines as enhancing public involvement, staff have also extended the duration of the DSEIR comment period: the statutorily required 45 -day review period has been extended to a total of 67 days, and the last day people can submit comments will be November 23`d. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 28, 2015 Page 11 of 15