Laserfiche WebLink
There were no items for consideration. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARING AND OTHER MATTERS <br />a. P15 -0384, City of Pleasanton <br />(1) Consider an amendment to the Pleasanton Municipal Code to expand <br />design review authority to include the first floor of historic homes in <br />residential zoning districts within the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) <br />Area; and (2) review the Historic Resource Survey of the residential <br />structures Downtown that were built before 1942. <br />Commissioners O'Connor and Piper recused themselves from participating in the matter <br />due to conflicts of interest. Commissioner Nagler joined the Commission at the dais. <br />Steve Otto presented the staff report and described the scope and key elements of the <br />project. He presented a brief history and overview of amendments the Council adopted, <br />starting with the City Council's creation of a Historic Preservation Task Force, who was <br />tasked with determining whether the existing policies and standards provided adequate <br />protection for historic resources, clarifying existing policies and processes as needed, <br />and making the process more predictable and streamlined to the extent feasible for <br />applicants. He stated that after numerous meetings over a span of about a year and <br />one half, the Task Force came back to the Council with a packet of amendments to the <br />Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP), the General Plan (GP), the Downtown Design <br />Guidelines (DTDG), and the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC). He then briefly <br />described some of the amendments that were approved by the City Council: <br />Modified the existing criteria used for determining if a residential structure is <br />considered a historic resource and would be protected from demolition: a <br />residential building in a residential zoning district built before 1942 determined to <br />be eligible for listing in the California Register using the "Pleasanton Downtown <br />Historic Context Statement" is considered a historic resource by the City. The <br />1942 date shall be revisited every ten years to determine if a change is <br />warranted. <br />Adopted a demolition definition for residential structures to be historic resources. <br />It generally requires the preservation of the first ten feet of the structure, including <br />the roof. <br />Changed an existing policy to require new homes to utilize or be based on one of <br />the architectural styles found Downtown dating before 1942 such as Victorian, <br />Craftsman, Mission Revival, etc. <br />4. Changed an existing policy and guideline to require that detached garages be <br />utilized and placed at the rear of the site when the lot width exceeds 60 feet. <br />5. Modified the Residential DTDG to (a) discourage metal roofs but allow metal <br />shingles with a dull finish and muted color that resembles shake or tile: (b) <br />discourage the replacement of wooden windows, but allow replacement with <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 14, 2015 Page 3 of 35 <br />