PC 101415 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Ritter said yes, as long as it complies with the nine designs in the Historic Context Statement and encompasses all houses regardless of whether they were built before or after 1942. Commissioner Nagler indicated that his is fine with having No. 4 come back to the Commission with any home within the DTSP area. Commissioner Balch stated that he believes non - historic homes significantly adds to the quality and value of the 88 homes and agreed that No. 4 be recommended to the Council. Chair Allen agreed with the Commissioners. She stated that the Survey is well done, Option 2 is good and consistent with the guidelines, and that it is important for the Commission to have another discussion on the houses beyond the 88 historic homes; however, she does not know if 1942 should be the cut -off date or if it should apply to all homes. Commissioner Ritter moved to find that the proposed amendment to the Pleasanton Municipal Code is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); to recommend that the City Council accept the Historic Resource Survey; to recommend approval of Case P15 -0384, amendment to the Pleasanton Municipal Code, as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report; and to recommend that the City Council discuss the merits of pursuing a separate Pleasanton Municipal Code amendment to expand design review authority to the exterior of non - historic single - family homes in residential zoning districts in the Downtown Specific Plan area. Commissioner Nagler seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Allen, Balch, Nagler, O'Connor, Piper, and Ritter NOES: None ABSTAIN: None RECUSED: None. ABSENT: None Resolution No. PC- 2015 -31 recommending approval of P15 -0432 was entered and adopted as motioned. Chair Allen called for a break at 8:40 p.m. and thereafter the Commission resumed its meeting at 8:50 p.m. Commissioners O'Connor and Piper rejoined the Commission at the dais. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 14, 2015 Page 19 of 35