PC 090915 - Laserfiche WebLink

and pulls all the way up to his garage, and the height just blocks their view. He noted that the trees are Heritage trees which have been there since he was a child. He agreed that he will definitely get more of a view when the Plum tree is removed. Francisco Matos, project architect, thanked the Commission and staff for reviewing the project. He stated that it seems that Pleasanton is known for the ridgeline, but anyone who walks up close enough to any building in this town will lose the view of that ridgeline. He noted that it is just a matter of perspective, and the way proposed building is designed will preserve the view of the ridge. Dana Cintrone, a neighbor, stated that she had a picture of a tiny little home in a huge city with skyscrapers all around it, which resulted from people's resistance to losing what they had, and everything was built around this little home. She stated that she did not want to be the person in that situation. She indicated that they have lived in this area for a long time, her husband was raised here, and it was changed to high density years ago. She stated that this is about views and preserving some open space in that little place where they live. She added that they downsized to a smaller house in this area because of the openness they had here, and that will change when a building is built right next to their house. , and they do not want to lose that. She indicated that they do not want to keep their neighbor from having this investment, but they do not want to lose their view and openness either. She stated that talking about cantilevered design reminded her of Frank Lloyd Wright: the concept is not always that ugly, and sometimes visualizing from a plan to reality might not be that different. She added that she liked the discussion with the applicant regarding the parking situation. Ms. Cintrone stated that she is aware that the preference is for Option 1, but as residents in the area, they did not find it very appealing as they would be driving into a very close, confined area to park. She added that if they had a choice, they would be storing their junk in a garage and park on the street. She indicated that they support Option 3 because the structure would not be that close to their house, and it would provide more openness so tenants would want to drive down there to park. She pointed out that their community is old, and it is different from other communities. She noted that it is not a cookie - cutter neighborhood; the houses on that street are not all the same, and that is the value of their community. She indicated that they trusted the Commission's good judgment and reiterated that they liked Option 3. Girish Reddy stated that he has lived in Pleasanton for over six years and works for a software company that hires a lot of young talent who have just graduated from college and want to live in the Downtown. He noted that because there is not enough housing in the Downtown for these folks, they go and live in San Francisco, which adds an hour of unproductive commute. He indicated that there is a need for more housing with smaller units that can support these fresh graduates, and that is the reason he is in favor of this project. Venkata Datla stated that he moved to Pleasanton eight years ago and started a software business about five years ago. He indicated that he has friends who own businesses in the Downtown, and one of the key things he noticed was that the traffic volume and foot traffic have gone down. He noted that he sees Pleasanton Downtown PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 9, 2015 Page 7 of 17