Laserfiche WebLink
Chair Allen stated that the bottom line is to try and get more commercial in there. She <br />indicated that she completely supports the goals of the DTSP and vitality to try and <br />move some of the service businesses that are not really retail- oriented, such as the <br />yoga studio and the beauty salons, the law offices and the insurance agencies, right <br />around the corner as they do not really need a retail storefront. She added that she <br />does not like to give up this piece of property that is the closest thing to Downtown to <br />almost all residential and would like to see a different ratio of commercial and <br />residential. She added that she is not into retail in the back, but a little bit of a different <br />commercial would be fine. She stated that she is open to commercial on the lower level <br />and maybe an artist's studio on the top level. She acknowledge that it will be more <br />challenging for the developer to lease, but it is not unreasonable and totally fits with the <br />Downtown goals. <br />Commissioner Nagler asked Chair Allen if she is suggesting that the retail go to the <br />back. <br />Chair Allen said no, indicating that she is fine with the business building on the front and <br />the commercial building, but she is not fine with the five townhouses, independent of <br />whether they are one story or three stories, being 100 percent residential. <br />Commissioner O'Connor asked Chair Allen what she would propose for the rest of the <br />lot. <br />Chair Allen replied that she would not propose that much with that much FAR on this <br />whole site, but she would go with some more service- oriented businesses with perhaps <br />what looks like a townhouse, a two -story design that has a service business, business <br />on the bottom level and residential on top. <br />Chair Allen stated that she walked the street several times, and most of the homes that <br />are there are single story: remodels and renovation, has band of service in the front <br />and many of them are putting and tucking a home, maybe even two homes, in the back. <br />She stated that she would like to see a little more commercial, although she is fine with <br />not wanting to put more commercial there. She added that she is also fine with going <br />higher on the floor area ratio (FAR) if there's more commercial, but if there is not more <br />commercial, then she would rather just remain with the standard that has been set <br />along that street, which is retail /commercial -like design and one or two residences <br />tucked in the back. <br />Chair Allen stated that in general, she thinks the Downtown guidelines should be <br />followed; she does not see anything so unique about this that the rule for a unique PUD <br />should be broken, when this is closest to Main Street and one can see almost half the <br />property from Main Street. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that when he talked about setting this building back a <br />bit, he thinks there is room to make the lower floor a little bit bigger than what it is so <br />that instead of the building being 2,000 square feet, it may be 3,000 square feet. He <br />indicated, however, that parking should be provided on -site, which can be accomplished <br />if the building is moved back. He recognized that it will take up some space away from <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 26, 2015 Page 36 of 43 <br />