Laserfiche WebLink
buy in on a 25 -foot wide drive aisle, the applicants were required to reduce the building <br />height to 30 feet or less. He indicated that the Fire Department would not pull their rig <br />into the site but would park on the street, and would, therefore, not require a turn- <br />around. <br />Mr. Knuppe stated that all of the units will be sprinklered too. <br />Mr. Weinstein referred to Commissioner O'Connor's earlier question about open space <br />and replied that this site is being rezoned to Planned Unit Development, so staff can <br />establish whatever regulations they want related to setbacks, open space and so forth. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he understood that the Overlay should be followed <br />for the area. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that the Central Commercial District, of which this is a part, would <br />normally be required to have 150 square feet per unit of private open space. He <br />indicated that this project has about 160 square feet. <br />With respect to the procedural question brought up by Chair Allen, Ms. Harryman stated <br />that per the Commissioner's Handbook, by 11:00 p.m., the Commission shall determine <br />by vote which agenda items if any it will take up that evening with the intent of <br />completing those items by 11:30 p.m. She indicated that this is the last public hearing <br />item, but there are still some other housekeeping items that follow, and she does not <br />know if there is anything to discuss there. She stated that the Commission should <br />decide if it to try and vote whether it will complete action on the agenda by 11:30 p.m. or <br />continue it to a future meeting. <br />Chair Allen advised that the Commission would continue and address the Discussion <br />Points. <br />A. Is the proposed commercial /office building adequately sized and designed for <br />either a retail or office tenant to allow the Planning Commission to make a finding <br />or consistency with the intent of the Downtown Specific Plan land use <br />designation of "Downtown Commercial ?" <br />B. If so, are residential uses appropriate for development on the remainder of the <br />subject parcel? <br />C. Does the Planning Commission support the proposed building setbacks and <br />building positioning? <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he does not know the size of each building that <br />goes down that street, but the ones sitting up front seem to be somewhere between <br />1,000 and 2,000 square feet, which is the size of this building with two stories. He <br />indicated that he does not have a problem with size with respect to the Mission style; he <br />finds the design beautiful and thinks it fits. He agreed with one of the speakers, <br />however, that this big structure would bury at least two or three of the little bungalows <br />and will be hidden from view when looking from Main Street. He added that the street is <br />so narrow that he would rather see the building sitting back a bit. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 26, 2015 Page 34 of 43 <br />