Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Nagler asked the applicants if they already had a sense of who might <br />occupy the retail office space. <br />Mr. Grant replied that both floors have been spoken for as a law office. <br />Commissioner Nagler commented that, in fact, they do not anticipate this being a retail <br />space. <br />Mr. Grant said no, at this time. He noted, however, that as mentioned earlier, they want <br />to ensure, in response to the request made in the event that it does eventually become <br />retail, that it works that way separately without an interior corridor. <br />Commissioner Nagler stated that his assumption would be that it is less critical for a law <br />firm to have street visibility than for a retail operation because lawyers presumably do <br />not rely on foot traffic to get their clients. He referred to Commissioner O'Connor's <br />earlier question and noted that it is theoretically possible to meet the desire of the <br />Downtown business district by having an office where the first living unit is currently <br />located, and the street unit really be marketed for retail as a way to try to bring retail <br />operations off of Main Street. <br />Mr. Grant replied it is absolutely theoretically possible. He added, however, that the <br />question still remains about how viable, how strong that space would be to a retail <br />tenant, and their feeling is that it would not be really strong in that location. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that the office now is buried behind the two -story retail <br />building. He noted that right now there the office is roughly 2,000 square feet, and the <br />building behind gives about the same space another 32 feet and the first one is 31 feet, <br />for a total of about a depth of 60 feet. He suggested that the law office could be <br />2,000 square feet on the second floor, and the bottom could still be split from the front to <br />be 50 feet to 60 feet deep and have two tenants. <br />Mr. Grant replied that it is possible to do that, but it would change the project, and he <br />does not know if that would make it a better project. <br />Commissioner Nagler inquired, in the context of looking at the overall evolution and <br />enhancement of the Downtown, if there is good reason to want the Downtown to spill <br />over into side streets as a way to increase the retail activity. He noted that this building <br />is a perfect opportunity to test the idea. <br />Mr. Grant said yes, but they have to look at the other tenant next to them, which is a <br />pest control office. He indicated that one has to get pretty close to First Street before <br />one finds more retail. He added that if he were a retailer he would not go there. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that the whole point is to try and spread retail down the <br />side street. He indicated that somebody has to start at the corner which is fairly deep, <br />and this site is the first one in line to start that process. He noted that they are buried in <br />between a couple of pest control guys, and right next door is a food market. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 26, 2015 Page 30 of 43 <br />