My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081215
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 081215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:52:26 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:43:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/12/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
have an opportunity to treat this a little bit like a Work Session with the Planning <br />Commission in the context of a public hearing so they can have a little bit more of a <br />dialogue with the Commission. <br />Ms. Hardy stated that she would like to start by addressing a couple of the points. She <br />stated that when they first looked at planning this site out with the 80,000- square -foot <br />Master Plan for the campus, the preschool and the academy school were a component <br />of that Plan. She displayed the Plan and pointed to the preschool to the right and to the <br />east, noting that the building closest to Busch Road has already been constructed along <br />with the second wing, which connects those two buildings and would be part of the <br />academy school. She indicated that when they first looked at planning this site, they <br />had to take into consideration the location of that preschool and that academy, and then <br />work with Montessori West, the operator of the school and several other facilities in the <br />Bay Area, along with the congregation, to arrive at a site plan that gave them the <br />circulation and parking that the school operator needed to make this a successful <br />operation. She noted that the operator was very, very keen on making certain there <br />was sufficient parking on the site, given the proposed adjoining residential project, <br />because if they had parking problems, they were going to have enrollment problems. <br />Ms. Hardy stated that Ponderosa addressed the site layout from that perspective, <br />working around the commitment made to the Church and to the preschool. She noted <br />that staff has now indicated that their preference is for a more coherent site plan. She <br />stated that this is an integrated site because it promotes walkability, and as Pastor <br />Barris had mentioned earlier, there will be a lot of people from a large residential area in <br />the Ironwood and neighboring communities, such as the Mohr -Martin area, who will <br />walk rather than drive their children to this preschool via the Iron Horse Trail. She <br />added that they are already waiting to enroll so that they can have their children attend <br />this preschool in the fall. <br />Ms. Hardy stated that from a site plan perspective, Ponderosa thought it was logical to <br />extend the existing Cornerstone Court along the north side of the property and then <br />have those two streets terminate with a cul -de -sac on one end and a hammerhead at <br />the other. She indicated that they did not want to have any street connections that went <br />into the Ironwood property because that would not be supported by that community. <br />Ms. Hardy stated that the City makes the provision for a Planned Unit Development <br />(PUD) to allow flexibility and site design when a parcel is constrained or has an <br />interesting configuration, as in the case with this site. She indicated that these uses <br />adjoining each other are complementary; the project also has that walkability factor that <br />promotes a lot of interaction amongst future residents and gives opportunities for people <br />to gather and get access to the Iron Horse Trail and other trails in the area. <br />Ms. Hardy then addressed the staff's issue about having recreational passive areas <br />incorporated in the site. She stated that they had a very good conversation with staff <br />about amenities when they first started having this discussion, and that is where they <br />came up with the notion of providing an informal seating area along the Iron Horse Trail. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 12, 2015 Page 6 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.