My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062415
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 062415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:49:59 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:39:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
which totals 1,500 trips. He pointed out that there is a big difference on their road than <br />the 550 trips max and obviously filtering through the different developments. He pointed <br />out that the project shrunk to 50 units; one -third the size, which in and of itself is <br />significant development. He recalled that one speaker mentioned at the Work Session <br />that Measure PP is working because this project did shrink because of it, that the <br />conservation element caused this project to shrink; hillside preservation was <br />accomplished through the Initiative, but the unintended consequences are what the <br />Commission is grappling with today. He noted that this is a very minor road, not the <br />Hayward Hotel road; a road with less grading than Bernal Avenue and very much less <br />visible than Bernal Avenue going up the side of the hill and over. <br />Commissioner Nagler stated that there are still 550 average trips a day; there is still <br />traffic, and the question still remains where that traffic should go. <br />On that note, Commissioner Balch questioned why staff Option 3 versus the EIR <br />Option 3 is the way to go. <br />Commissioner Nagler replied that it is the possibility of cut - through, because if one end <br />of the neighborhood is connected and the exit is on the other end, the whole cut - through <br />issue could be exacerbated. <br />Chair Allen stated that it is a long way around. She added that at the last meeting, the <br />Commission talked a little bit more about volumes, and Mr. Tassano hypothesized that <br />the volumes would be roughly two to three times as many cars if the road were allowed <br />to be open. <br />Mr. Tassano agreed that it does seem like it is a long way around, but staff has watched <br />a lot of different long- way- around routes go, and it is a valid concern. He indicated that <br />he does not usually bring up concerns if they are minor, but it concerns him that people <br />would take that Junipero Street/independence Drive route. He noted that 150 vehicles <br />go there every morning that cut through, and they are just going to school. He was his <br />concerned that if it is connected, then it would provide that cut - through option. He <br />added that it is not certain either if Junipero Street and Independence Drive are going to <br />get 20 percent or 80 percent of the traffic, if they are all going to go to Raley's and take <br />that other route. He concluded that the final routing would be a little bit more of the <br />unknown, and it is more of a 50/50 split. <br />Commissioner Nagler inquired if the facts changed the positions. <br />Chair Allen replied that they did not change for her. <br />Commissioner Piper stated that it did not change for her either. <br />Chair Allen called for a break at 10:20 p.m. and thereafter reconvened the meeting at <br />10:28 p.m. <br />Commissioner Balch suggested that the Commission go through the conditions and the <br />other elements before making a motion. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2015 Page 40 of 54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.