My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062415
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 062415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:49:59 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:39:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
which option is selected, some of those funds could be used to supplement projects in <br />these two affected neighborhoods. <br />Commissioner Nagler inquired, for clarification purposes, if the residents of Junipero <br />Street or the neighborhood would support implementing traffic - calming measures in the <br />neighborhood today if the funding existed. <br />Mr. Tassano replied that he did not know and that it would take a petition. He explained <br />that some of the difficulty lies in the fact that people are not in support if the tool were <br />placed in front of their home. He stated that if a resident does not want the <br />traffic - calming measure in front of his /her home, then staff will go to the neighbor's <br />house; and if they do not like it, staff will keep moving down; and if staff cannot find a <br />suitable location, then staff concludes that it probably is not a big enough issue. <br />Commissioner Nagler asked Mr. Tassano if he has had a conversation with that <br />neighborhood recently to give him any sense of whether they would support the <br />measure. <br />Mr. Tassano replied that was correct. <br />3. The question of road width has come up, and Commissioner Balch stated that it <br />is his understanding that there is a point where Junipero Street becomes a wider <br />road. He added that he saw a lot of "No Parking" signs up on the other road <br />being violated by a lot of landscapers yesterday and today. <br />Mr. Tassano replied that staff has had this question on numerous occasions, so Traffic <br />Engineering staff went out and measured each of those locations. He then presented <br />some slides showing the roadway widths: 40 feet through Junipero Street as well as on <br />Independence Drive, all the way down to Lund Ranch Road. He noted that Sycamore <br />Creek Way was designed wider and has the bike lanes, with no parking on one side. <br />He added that he believes there is no parking on either side closer down all the way by <br />Sunol Boulevard, and that there are no other restrictions in the rest of that <br />neighborhood. <br />Mr. Tassano stated that 32 feet is a roadway width staff uses when there are under <br />1,000 vehicles per day. He noted that there are roadways that are 30 feet wide with <br />parking on both sides, for example, Pleasanton Avenue, but the volume is such that if <br />there happens to be a car coming in the opposite direction, the other car either yields or <br />slides by. <br />Commissioner Balch inquired if, under Option 3, gaining approximately 180 trips on <br />Sunset Creek Lane and 260 on Sycamore Creek Way, a 32 -foot road width statement <br />would exceed the 1,000 trips. <br />Mr. Tassano said no. He stated that the current volume on the end is 100 trips, and <br />Hanifen Way is 130. He noted that the volume increases as more vehicles come onto <br />the roadway because there are more homes. He added that the highest volume count <br />that staff had in the traffic report was about 580 closer to the end of the residential <br />street, so adding traffic there on that distribution would bring it closer to that 1,000. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2015 Page 29 of 54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.