My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 051315
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 051315
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:47:25 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:35:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/13/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Tony Adams, Applicant and Property Owner, stated that they have a colored rendering <br />somewhere. <br />Mr. Weinstein explained that the building actually went through some relatively recent <br />design modifications and that it was possible that staff did not get a colored rendering <br />after those latest design changes were made. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if there will be a stucco overlay with the blocks going <br />away. <br />Mr. Weinstein said yes <br />Commissioner Piper expressed concern about the square footage of the single - family <br />residence which seems really large for that particular part of the Downtown. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that staff had similar concerns when the application was first <br />submitted, and staff did work with the applicant to reduce the square footage slightly, <br />but more importantly to increase the architectural interest of the building. He explained <br />that when staff looks at building massing, they compare the square footage of the <br />project site to what the Zoning Ordinance allows in this zone. He added that a floor <br />area ratio (FAR) of 300 percent is allowed on this property per the zoning regulations, <br />and this project is resulting in something like 48 percent FAR. He agreed that the <br />building does appear big, but the site allows for a lot of building construction on the site. <br />He indicated that based on the improvements and design that as well as the FAR <br />requirements, staff felt this is an appropriate building size for this site. <br />Commissioner Piper stated that residential would be 40 percent FAR and inquired if that <br />was correct. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that the City has different floor area ratio requirements depending <br />on its residential zone, so it could be 40 percent to 50 percent for a typical residentially <br />zoned property. <br />Commissioner Piper inquired if it is consistent with other homes. She commented that it <br />may be consistent with those on St. Mary's Street to the west but not necessarily right <br />around that area. She noted that this is not necessarily a big concern of hers but that it <br />just seems like a pretty big house for that spot. <br />Mr. Weinstein agreed that it is a big house for the lot, but it does not nearly exceed the <br />zoning regulations. He noted that there are a lot of houses of different sizes farther <br />west through the Downtown, and there are some historic houses on Division Street that <br />probably have relatively low FARs, and there are others whose FARs are probably <br />close to or exceeding this. He added that there is a diversity of massing in this part of <br />the Downtown, and the trend now, generally speaking, is to have bigger houses on <br />smaller lots. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 13, 2015 Page 22 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.