My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 051315
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 051315
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:47:25 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:35:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/13/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
concerned about the overhang, from an abundance of caution, but that it is a sharp - <br />looking building and he would change anything in the design. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that parking is a bigger issue for this building as they <br />are supplying 1,800 square feet of outdoor dining. He pointed out that there is a <br />demand for that, and more people are going to occupy this restaurant. He indicated <br />that he is not suggesting that the same exact fee should be provided per 300 square <br />feet, but the building that was torn down required 12 spaces, and this one needs only <br />three. He stated that he does not want to come up short when it is time to build <br />something Downtown in the railroad right -of -way or elsewhere, and he does not want to <br />end up where the City does not have the money so it never gets built. He indicated that <br />he hopes more there are more renovations and improvement in Downtown, but there is <br />a lot more demand today and there will be a need for parking places for these cars. He <br />noted that both the City and PDA are concerned about the demand for parking; he did <br />not think adding three spaces will be enough but he is not sure requiring all nine spaces <br />is the right thing to do either. He indicated that the Commission has seen some other <br />projects that have gone through, and the City has not always asked for the right amount <br />of parking or in -lieu fees to get where it should be. He stated that this practice needs to <br />be stopped and that either parking or the in -lieu fees be required so parking can be built <br />someplace. <br />Commissioner Balch asked if the net parking credit the applicant is getting is three. <br />Commissioner O'Connor confirmed that the net is three right now; the extra square feet <br />of outside space is not being counted because it is not within the building. <br />Commissioner Nagler inquired if the applicant is getting credit for the 12 spaces on the <br />notion that the Downtown has somehow already accommodated for those 12 spaces. <br />Commissioner Balch said yes, based on the areas they would need to eat, and the net <br />of three. <br />Chair Allen stated that the building would receive 15 spaces excluding the outdoor <br />dining. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that an extra six would be required for the outdoor <br />dining area, if based on 300 square feet; it would then be 21 instead of 15. <br />Commissioner Balch inquired if this refers to the second floor area since the outdoor <br />dining on the first -floor patio is 500 square feet. He noted that the upper level terrace is <br />1,300 square feet, which would make a total of 18. <br />Chair Allen noted that would be an additional five. <br />Commissioner O'Connor said yes. He noted that parking was not required in some of <br />the other buildings but instead of an outdoor dining area per se, as opposed to terraces, <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 13, 2015 Page 14 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.