My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042215
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 042215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:46:22 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:29:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/22/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Nagler asked Mr. Weinstein to talk about the Council discussion at its <br />meeting last night regarding agendizing the EPSP for a future Council conversation. <br />Mr. Weinstein stated that he was not at the Council meeting but that the City Council <br />decided to agendize a conversation about the EPSP process moving forward or not. He <br />indicated that no date has been set but that it should be scheduled within the next few <br />meetings. He added that theoretically, the City Council will decide at that meeting to <br />pull the plug on the Plan or keep it moving forward. <br />Commissioner Piper inquired if this was a result of the Neighborhood Meeting. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that it is a combination of the comments on water and <br />building homes, in addition to the public comment period at the beginning of the <br />meeting. He indicated that he watched the Council meeting last night and it sounded <br />like the City Manager, Nelson Fialho, is thinking of scheduling it for the first meeting in <br />May. <br />Commissioner Balch added that he wanted to quickly mention this one other thing that <br />came out of the Task Force meetings that the land is already zoned. He stated that <br />people have this impression that the land is "free- and -clear unzoned land," but it is fully <br />zoned as Heavy Industrial, based on the General Plan that is in place. He noted that <br />the site could theoretically be built that way, and one of the things that did come out of <br />the Task Force is that rezoning the site per the Preferred Plan would actually reduce the <br />traffic impact to City, versus if it is built according to its actual zoning, which would <br />basically cripple the City. He added that he did not want to misspeak on it and say that <br />it is potentially an issue; but that was something discussed, that it is actually being <br />rezoning lighter than it currently is. <br />Chair Allen stated that there are a lot of ways to interpret that, and people will have to <br />wait and see to really understand it. <br />Mr. Weinstein informed the Commissioners that they are more than welcome to take <br />look at the Alternatives section of the Draft EIR which discusses the impacts of that <br />alternative along with the other alternatives explored in the Draft EIR. <br />Commissioner Piper inquired if everything, including the Task Force, will essentially <br />stop if the Council pulls the plug. <br />Commissioner Ritter commented that the it might not be the right time to put a big plan <br />together, but right now, staff will still go ahead to get comments, record and keep track <br />of them and see what direction the City Council gives. <br />Commissioner Piper inquired if anyone at the meeting gave positive feedback on the <br />Plan. <br />Chair Allen replied that she did not hear any. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 22, 2015 Page 7 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.