My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 032515
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 032515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:46:08 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:28:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/25/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lund Ranch II <br />Mr. Dolan stated that there are lots of things regarding the Lund Ranch II project that <br />are requiring additional time. He noted that some of the information the Commission <br />requested takes a fair amount of time not only to find the money but also to accomplish <br />He indicated that staff is still negotiating the Housing Agreement with the applicant and <br />is also working with them on the Development Agreement. He stated that the earliest it <br />would be is the second meeting in April, and if the Housing Agreement gets bogged <br />down, it could take even longer than that. <br />Chair Allen asked staff to double -check to make sure everybody will be present. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that he has also established relationships with some of the key people <br />in the neighborhood and have notified them of the delay but that he will probably have <br />to give them an update every two weeks or so. <br />Commissioner O'Connor asked Mr. Dolan to give the Commission a little detail of what's <br />included in that Housing Agreement. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requires a certain <br />commitment to providing affordable housing; there are some options and it typically <br />requires negotiation. He indicated that it is pretty easy to do for an apartment building <br />because the units are generally requested and dispersed throughout the building; <br />however, for a single - family development, especially detached single - family in a hillside <br />community, having every fourth or fifth house be at an affordable level does not really <br />seem like the best use of resources. He noted that there is an in -lieu affordable housing <br />fee that the developer can pay, and sometimes the City will negotiate for more than the <br />minimum. <br />Commissioner O'Connor clarified that the Housing Agreement really talks about the <br />affordable housing piece. <br />Mr. Dolan said yes and added that it is not something in the Planning Commission's <br />jurisdiction but that of the Housing Commission and the City Council. He indicated that <br />the City has always at least had an agreement with the applicant as to what the <br />proposal was going to be that staff can describe to the Planning Commission before <br />anything else is brought forward to the Planning Commission. <br />Commissioner O'Connor commented that Mr. Dolan had mentioned in the past year or <br />so that these agreements are now more voluntary because of a case law. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that there was a case law that only affected the apartments; but while <br />the requirements on ownership were not affected by that case, the City's ability to <br />negotiate was somewhat limited, and the staff is rectifying that with a change to the <br />Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance which will go through the Planning Commission because <br />that is in the Zoning Code. <br />Commissioner O'Connor commented that the City has been successful with actually <br />getting more cooperation from the developers. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 25, 2015 Page 26 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.