My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022515
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 022515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:45:14 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:27:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/25/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dolan replied that this was quite early on in the process, shortly after Measure PP was <br />passed. He indicated that staff asked the applicant actually to run it and it did not change <br />that much; and staff did not go even cruder using a ten -foot contour line because the <br />community would not accept it. <br />Commissioner Nagler asked if this is a two -foot contour and if it can be determined at any <br />single point if the slope is greater than 25 percent. <br />Mr. Dolan said yes. He explained that it does not include every molehill, but it is a natural <br />technique of smoothing that a topography map does not provide. <br />Chair Allen stated that she does not know anything about the slope numbers and inquired if <br />there are precedents from other cities, such as Lafayette, that have a hillside ordinance <br />indicating what is typically used. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that there are some cities that use the averaging technique, which is far <br />cruder. He added that there are formulas some cities use where the average slope of a <br />certain sized area, where there may be some flat and some very steep slopes, is taken and <br />then have that entire area represented by that number. He indicated that this is fine for a <br />big area, but staff is usually asked to be very precise in this community. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that measuring a slope every two feet over a significant <br />distance is not what he had in mind initially. He indicated that he is not one to say whether <br />it is correct or not, but he thinks it sounds like staff looked at other distances or <br />measurement methods and they are comfortable with it, so he does not disagree with it. <br />Chair Allen stated that if it does not entail a lot of work, it might not hurt to have some <br />benchmarks from other cities in the area that have hillside ordinances. She noted that the <br />City use those as references or to provide perspective on why the method the City picked <br />appears to be the best for Pleasanton. <br />Commissioner Balch suggested the City of Fremont which implemented an easement for <br />hillsides a few years ago based on the toe of the hill. He added that Orinda and other cities <br />in the Tri- Valley area might also be possibilities. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that staff will look at a few <br />• Identifying Ridges <br />Commissioner Balch stated that the way staff did it appears reasonable and that he has no <br />problem with it. <br />Commissioners Ritter and Nagler, as well as Chair Allen, stated that they agreed with <br />staff's report as well. <br />Commissioner Piper stated that she had no comment. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 25, 2015 Page 39 of 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.