PC 022515 - Laserfiche WebLink

out Lund Ranch Road, which uses Junipero Street and Independence Drive and just a little bit on Mission Drive. Given the directional distribution in place right now from some of the Lunch Ranch Road established homes as well as what the traffic model predicts, the directional distribution would be 180 head up towards Bernal Avenue using Independence Drive, and 370 head west towards Sunol Boulevard using Junipero Street and Mission Drive. Scenario 3. This has two connections. The trip distribution would be based on whether vehicles are traveling down 1 -680 or 1 -580, if they want to go Downtown, and so forth: 70 using Independence Drive; 150 using Junipero Street/Mission Drive, and 130 and 200 coming out the Sunset Creek Lane side. There is some variation on the 330 on Sunset Creek Lane: whether it is 130 on Sunset Creek Lane and 200 on Hanifen Way, or if the 130 is really 150. A lot of it depends on how well one can see coming around corners, if one likes to make left turns or right turns, or the traffic circles. Scenario 6. This scenario is based on the Bonde Agreement where Livingston Place would be closed and drivers on Middleton Place would have to then go down and around and use Sunset Creek Lane for its exit. This has 550 project trips. The 15 homes on Middleton Place would be assigned to also go down and use Sunset Creek Lane. These are added to the 550, which gives the directional distribution: 270 on Sunset Creek Lane and 420 on Sycamore Creek Way, for a total of 690 trips. Commissioner Ritter inquired why Livingston Place was closed under Scenario 6. Mr. Tassano replied that when Lund Ranch was developed back in the 1990s, there was some concern about the design of how Lund Ranch II would come in. Mr. Dolan explained that when Bonde Ranch came in, Ventana Hills was very concerned about the traffic that would be coming through its neighborhood. He indicated that some compromises were made when Bonde Ranch was approved, and one of them was to hook up Middleton Place to Livingston Place but would be disconnected when Lund Ranch II comes forward, and the 15 homes on Middleton Place will then be re- directed through Lund Ranch II. He noted that the Middleton Place residents do not support this as they would be routed down a longer route through Lund Ranch II and out to Sunset Creek Lane. He noted that at one point, they filed a PUD amendment to the Bonde Ranch approval to eliminate that condition. He added that while the City ultimately has the ability to do that, staff's position is to consider this with the Lund Ranch II review. Commissioner Piper asked Mr. Tassano to explain briefly the distribution if both Sunset Creek Lane and Lund Ranch Road were open, and how staff arrived at the number of trips going one way or the other way. Mr. Tassano replied that every residential neighborhood has trips that go various places, e.g., to the grocery, to work in Livermore, or down 1 -680 to Fremont. He explained that staff then generates the percentages, using the City of Pleasanton's general percentages, and assigns those based on where this project is located: for example, 33 percent travel south PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 25, 2015 Page 13 of 46