PC 021115 - Laserfiche WebLink

stated that he thinks what is important is the timing, and the Commission should move the project forward and let staff work with the applicant. He added that the Commission has voiced an opinion, and that will carry forward; furthermore, the City Council will have the opportunity to weigh in as well. Commissioner Nagler stated that everyone has worked very hard to make the development appropriate to the site and to the City, and the developer has acknowledged and been responsive the Commission's comments. With respect to the particular issue raised by Chair Allen, he stated that he totally appreciates that she did raise it and will follow her lead and be supportive of her recommendation. Chair Allen stated that she too likes the design and appreciates all the work that has been done, which will show well. She indicated that she would like to add the one condition relative to the beauty salons and massage uses: Items 7 and 8 on "Permitted Uses" and Item 1 on "Conditional Uses /Retail," that there be a maximum of 5,000 square feet for these uses, given the feedback from the applicant as well. She stated that she is also comfortable with forwarding this to the Council, given that the applicant is willing to work with staff regarding Tilted Kilt. She noted that everyone is trying to come up with a win /win situation and have uses that would be perceived broadly as ones the whole community would be proud of. She specifically asked staff to look at a usage like this and understand: (1) the incremental potential enforcement implications that have been historic to a Hooters or a Tilted Kilt are; (2) parking implications, because this could be a higher usage than traditional restaurants and might bring in a crowd that has different habits, especially given their earlier discussion about the parking challenges at Pleasanton Gateway; and (3) stipulations relative to this kind of establishment. Commissioner O'Connor noted that with respect to parking, the staff report states that compact parking is about 25 percent of the project, which he finds to be fairly high. He stated that in some particular commercial developments he is aware of, smaller -sized parking is usually under - utilized as a lot of people will not park there because the space is just tighter. Commissioner Nagler noted that most of the compact parking is delegated to employee parking, which is sort of interesting, given its assumption about employees' cars. Commissioner O'Connor moved to find the previously prepared EIR and SEIR, including the adopted CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, are adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for this project and satisfy all the requirements of CEQA, and that the proposed PUD Development Plan is consistent with the General Plan and the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan Amendment/Staples Ranch; to make the PUD findings for the proposed Development Plan as listed in the staff report; and to recommend approval of Case PUD -108, subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A of the staff report, with modifications to Items 7 and 8 under "Permitted Uses" and Item 1 under "Conditional Uses /Retail" of Condition of Approval No. 2 to limit barbershops and beauty shops with massage services uses to 5,000 square feet within the entire shopping center; and with direction to staff to PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 11, 2015 Page 8 of 17