Laserfiche WebLink
not about changing entitlement levels or anything like that, but producing a better <br />processing document. <br />Commissioner Nagler commented that it sounds like it is to maintain the status quo but <br />in a way that is usable and understandable. <br />Mr. Dolan said yes. <br />2. City Zoning Code Update (on page 6 of 13) <br />A few years ago, a Customer Service Review Team was put together as an advisory <br />committee to the City Council on how customer service could be improved for <br />various applicants within the community development services realm, and this <br />ranged from small builders to big time developers, commercial /residential, other <br />people that just use City services. One point of emphasis was that they believed <br />that the Zoning Code was outdated even in the simplest ways, such as the list of <br />allowed uses, where the use of blacksmiths continues to be regulated and is an <br />indication of how outdated the overall document is, but there are uses that did not <br />exist a long time ago when the Zoning Code was originally created, and staff <br />references other related uses, bumping them into a category that is almost the same <br />but not quite. There really is a need to update; there are probably a few <br />opportunities, and this is what the development community and the real estate <br />industries are interested in. There are some uses that staff brings back over and <br />over to the Planning Commission; they require a Use Permit and have the same set <br />of six conditions every time. They are put on the Consent Calendar, but the question <br />is if they really need a Use Permit any more. Staff figured out how these need to be <br />regulated, so they should be put through the regulations and let go. The Zoning <br />Code really needs to be looked through for these uses. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that those are the two items that he would just throw out there for the <br />Commission's consideration. He indicated that the Commission would not need to <br />adopt or recommend both, but he is leaving that for the Commission's discussion. <br />Commissioner O'Connor recalled that that fell under the streamlining of the City's <br />processes about five years back. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that there were about 70 recommendations that came out of that <br />Committee, and staff implemented virtually every single one that they had the ability to <br />do internally just as an administrative change in process. He noted that there were a <br />number that required Council action, and staff had a hard time getting them into the high <br />priority area where staff would have to be assigned. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />There were no speakers. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that the Commission had talked about these two items <br />for several years, but they did not quite make it to the short list. He indicated that when <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 11, 2015 Page 11 of 17 <br />