Laserfiche WebLink
scary to some, but parts of those vehicles are in fact much safer than most. She agreed <br />that the delivery schedule can change, but the general pattern is not likely to change <br />very much. <br />Dr. Kenefick stated that students using the playground will be behind a six -foot tall steel <br />fence and will be supervised at all times. She added that some might find the location <br />of this play area inappropriate on the aesthetics, but factually where safety is <br />concerned, students are in no more danger if they are in the playground when a truck <br />comes to Raley's and if a truck driver chooses to use this exit, then they would be <br />waiting for a public school bus where there is no fence and often no adult monitor. She <br />pointed out that, therefore, to suggest that the volume type of truck traffic using the <br />utility corridor behind Oakhill requires that this application be denied is stretching the <br />truth a bit. <br />With respect to the issue of noise, Dr. Kenefick stated that the nail parlor and the music <br />school are the two entities nearest YIA, and the music school's practice rooms as well <br />as the YIA classroom have been soundproofed so noise would not be an issue to the <br />adjacent businesses. <br />Dr. Kenefick stated that local residences beyond the perimeter are likewise normally <br />insulated and have dual -paned windows that would buffer sound from the exterior. She <br />briefly addressed the letter from a neighbor, Exhibit D: <br />1. Increased traffic congestion. This is not a valid concern. <br />2. Loss of parking lot on back of the shopping center (conversion to playground) <br />and on the street. This is also not a valid concern as the parking is not a <br />significant issue. <br />3. Loss of short -cut access to the shopping center and inconvenience for disabled. <br />The front of the shopping center is fully supplied with recently improved disabled <br />access. She noted that there is no disabled access from the parking lot to the <br />rear, whether or not because the Code does not require the provision of disabled <br />access from a utility zone, but a ramp at the curb, if desired, could certainly be <br />accomplished when the playground is constructed. <br />4. Increased level of noise from playground. As earlier mentioned, most <br />Pleasanton homes are insulated and have dual -paned windows which effectively <br />block most exterior sound; additionally, the playground will be used by limited <br />numbers of students for limited periods of time. <br />5. Possibility of increased neighborhood crime activities as an place with young <br />children is a target for child abuser. This is not really valid issue. While there are <br />sexual predators in the world, it would not be a concern at all in a supervised <br />environment <br />In summary, Dr. Kenefick stated that this is not an ill- conceived unworkable and <br />inappropriate undesirable issue to the Oakhill Shopping Center. She acknowledged <br />that neither is it in all ways ideal, but considered in its context, it is a matter of common <br />sense which creates a safely fence zoned for supervised recreation for the children and <br />makes fresh air and movement part of their daily afternoon routine, encouraging focus <br />in the classroom and promoting exercise and health. She indicated that she is not <br />suggesting that there are no valid concerns here, but to block approval of this play area <br />gives disproportionate weight and does these children a disservice. She added that <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 12, 2014 Page 24 of 35 <br />