My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111214
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 111214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:24:07 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:21:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/12/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Toms stated that he would like to find a solution away from the two stories, but he is <br />more concerned that these current designs do not fit the 1970's style neighborhood of <br />single -story homes. He pointed out that many would try to remodel in a manner that <br />maintains the integrity of the particular neighborhood, and this unique Pleasanton jewel <br />of a neighborhood will forever be eliminated from the City's inventory of special <br />neighborhoods and just become another residential street in town, and that is a <br />detriment to the entire community. <br />Mr. Toms asked the Commission to take into consideration that this design does not <br />meld with the rest of the neighborhood per the General Plan, either in scale or look, and <br />take into account that no attempt was made at compromise and accommodation <br />requested by the Commission during the last meeting on this matter. He requested that <br />the Commission deny this application and see if a design can be had that allows the <br />applicant of this property the additional space in their home, which they are entirely <br />entitled to, without compromising the uniformity and style of this particular <br />neighborhood. <br />Forest Sass stated that he has lived in the neighborhood for 27 years, and at the time <br />his wife and he purchased the home, they were promised that Rosepointe would remain <br />all single -story homes. He indicated that he understood there are some split -level <br />homes, what might be thought of as two -story homes, but he and his wife were <br />promised that this community would remain single -story, and if the Commission were to <br />approve this application, he would feel betrayed of that promise. <br />Mr. Sass stated that he does not want to deny the owners the need or desire to expand <br />the size of their home, but his objection is specifically the two -story nature of the home. <br />He indicated that approving this house would be tantamount to "allowing the camel's <br />nose into the tent," and once begun will never stop: there would be other applications <br />for two -story approvals, and he would not like to see that. <br />Mr. Sass stated that roughly 15 years ago, one of the neighbors around the corner on <br />Arlington Drive requested a two- story addition to their house. He indicated that his wife <br />and he and other neighbors objected to it for the very same reasons that he is standing <br />here before the Commission today: that it would be inconsistent with the nature of the <br />Rosepointe development. He noted that they ultimately dropped their request. <br />Mr. Sass closed by stating that he grew up in the south end of Alameda, and the <br />community he lived in was predominantly single -story Craftsmen bungalows built about <br />the 1940's. He indicated that over a span of 50 years, he watched the City of Alameda <br />allow second stories to be built in that neighborhood, and that street where he grew up <br />is now filled with these out of character, large homes that look overbuilt and very ugly. <br />He asked the Commission to please deny the request. <br />Christine Steiner stated that she has lived in Rosepointe since 1967 and that she finds it <br />very, very sad to be here because Mr. Schmitt spent many hours in her family room and <br />living room playing with her kids and hitting balls on her back lawn. She indicated that <br />she really has nothing personal about him because he was part of her family for years; <br />his family moved away, the house was rented for many years, and then he came back. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 12, 2014 Page 12 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.