PC 102214 - Laserfiche WebLink

Industrial /Commercial- Office) District and PUD-0 (Planned Unit Development — Office) District, and establishment of a zoning designation of the PUD -I /C -O (Planned Unit Development — Industrial /Commercial- Office) District for the 0.59 -acre vacant parcel; (3) PUD Development Plan approval to construct an approximately 5,399- square -foot Chick -fil -A restaurant with two drive - through lanes and related site improvements; and (4) PUD Major Modification to the PUD governing the Pleasanton Square II development (PUD- 96 -13; 5225 -6015 Johnson Drive) to accommodate the proposed Chick -fil -A development. Also consider the Negative Declaration prepared for the project. Commissioner Balch recused himself due to an economic conflict of interest. Jenny Soo presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key elements of the proposal. She then referred to a staff memo recommending minor changes to the Conditions of Approval resulting from staff's discussion with the applicant. She added that staff is also recommending that Condition No. 12 be modified to read: "No temporary or permanent signage is approved as part of this application." She noted that the sign proposal is included in the staff report and packet. Commissioner Piper referred to the Traffic Impact Analysis report prepared by Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., Exhibit C of the staff report, and noted that the hours of operation stated in the report, 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., were inconsistent with those stated in the staff report, 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight. She pointed out, however, that the Traffic Impact Analysis report was prepared a year ago. Ms. Soo explained that the applicant had requested to extend the hours of operation to midnight, Mondays through Saturdays; the restaurant is closed on Sundays. Mr. Weinstein stated that because the focus of the Traffic Analysis is really on the AM and PM peak hours, extending the hours of operation to midnight does not affect the conclusions of the report. Commissioner Piper then referred to the Noticing Map, Exhibit F of the staff report, and stated that based on the number of feet in the notification area, it seems like not a lot of business owners or tenants within the commercial area were notified. She inquired if this is a project for which all City of Pleasanton property owners, residents, and tenants would receive notification or just those within this given radius. She noted that a project like this would be something the general public of Pleasanton would want to know about. Ms. Soo replied that notification was sent to all property owners, residents, and tenants within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site and not to the entire City. Commissioner Ritter asked staff about the left -turn lane from northbound Hopyard Road to westbound Owens Drive relating to extending the vehicle queuing lane and inquired if there was a drawing that shows this. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 22, 2014 Page 4 of 30