My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 102214
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 102214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:23:14 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:18:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/22/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
see the roundabout at that location more in the center so there is more parking next to <br />the buildings and more flow- through traffic through the center of the parking lot. He <br />pointed out that at the Wells Fargo Bank in Pleasanton Gateway, one has to back up <br />while making a turn to get out, but he likes that they all flow down on one side. He <br />added that with respect to the traffic flow, he would like to make sure that the shop that <br />gets the most traffic is possibly near the entrance versus at the back of the parking lot to <br />keep the flow from clogging up the rest of the parking lot and not have people cut <br />through the parking lot to get out if they're in a busy area. He indicated that he would <br />support whatever the traffic engineers figure out for the parking lot as they are the <br />experts. He added that he does not have a problem with the 20 -foot setbacks. <br />Commissioner Piper stated that everything is acceptable to her and that she also like <br />staff's recommendations. <br />Regarding Commissioner Ritter's comment about the Pleasanton Gateway circulation <br />being a mess, Commissioner Balch stated that it is absolutely horrific. He indicated that <br />the on -site circulation at the proposed site needs to be well thought out. <br />Commissioner Piper agreed <br />Chair O'Connor commented that Pleasanton Gateway seems to have a main <br />drive - through that goes right down the middle of all of the aisles where vehicles coming <br />from both directions have to get into. He recommended that staff look at this one <br />closely. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that a vehicle at that drive aisle by Building A that is trying <br />to make a right turn to exit will not be able to get out for a while if there is a line of <br />vehicles coming from the main Building E down that path. He added that Building A is <br />two stories with people trying to get to it at a higher density than to the one story <br />Building C. He commented that Building A's parking, no doubt, will really be horrific. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired if the roundabout will have yield signs so the first vehicle <br />coming to the intersection gets to go first. <br />Ms. Wallis replied that it is not actually a roundabout or a raised curb but an <br />intersection, and staff is having the decorative paving in a circle form removed so as not <br />to confuse motorists. <br />Commissioner Balch noted that it is not signaled and so another issue that may occur is <br />that there will be back up onto Stoneridge Drive by vehicles trying to make a left turn <br />into that first neighbor driveway. He inquired if that concern will be sufficiently <br />addressed. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that the Traffic Engineer's recommendation is to add another <br />left -turn lane onto Stoneridge Drive to prevent backups at that location. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired if that is for exiting the project site and not entering. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that it is for exiting the project only. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 22, 2014 Page 20 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.