Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Grant replied that an open exterior balcony serves all the office spaces on the <br />second level, and there is as much glass as possible in order to get a wealth of natural <br />light into all those tenant spaces. He pointed out that the exterior balcony cannot be <br />enclosed, and that openness is carried into the stairwells. He noted that the renderings <br />had some of the stairs extending out away 90 degrees from the face of the building, and <br />those have been dropped in in most cases so that they tuck in tighter. He added that <br />they are also beautifully designed architectural features and are supported by a slab of <br />stone or brick. <br />Commissioner Piper inquired if the exterior staircase is the only way for the people <br />occupying the second level to get to their office space. She further inquired what the <br />primary way to get to the office space is. <br />Mr. Grant replied that both of the office buildings have elevators. He added that the <br />primary way will be the way the people choose because they will have the opportunity in <br />close proximity to parking to take the stairs or to take the elevator, whichever they <br />prefer. <br />Commissioner Piper stated that she liked the look but wondered about safety when it is <br />raining and the stairs are slippery because they do not appear to be covered much at <br />all. <br />Mr. Grant replied that there is one covered staircase in both buildings. <br />Mr. Blake explained that the two -story buildings is not really office space like <br />professional office space where a worker goes there and sits all day and works and nc <br />one comes and sees them. He indicated that this is really a public consumer, <br />accessible office space, and they are trying to make it inviting so people see the stairs <br />and not have to go inside a dark stairwell. <br />David Preiss, Holland & Knight, representing Vulcan Materials Company, stated that <br />their concern is limited to the EVA proposed along El Charro Road. He noted that on <br />the last page of his letter, they did a little markup of the site plan to show that their <br />preferred location would be farther south, essentially coming in along the back of <br />Building E instead of being farther up on El Charro Road. He indicated that this would <br />basically take the EVA away from where the largest mix of quarry truck and other traffic <br />might occur both now and in the future, particularly with East Pleasanton coming on line <br />in the future. He added that the applicants have indicated they will work with Vulcan, <br />and they will work with the City to try and work this out so when it comes back to the <br />Commission for actual approval, Vulcan need not be present. He noted that Vulcan has <br />striven for many years to open this area up so they are not here to object to the project. <br />Finally, Mr. Preiss stated that there was a reference on the plan to two bike trails right <br />alongside El Charro Road near where the EVA was, and he indicated that they would <br />like to have subsequent discussions on that as they have some safety concerns about <br />the bike route along the road and would like that to be addressed. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 22, 2014 Page 17 of 30 <br />