My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 100814
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 100814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:21:10 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:17:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/8/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Allen, O'Connor, and Ritter <br />NOES: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />RECUSED: Commissioner Balch <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Piper <br />Resolution No. PC- 2014 -45 approving Case P14 -1151 was entered and adopted as <br />motioned. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARING AND OTHER MATTERS <br />There are no Public Hearing items for consideration. <br />MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />Small - Animal Farm on Bernal Propert v <br />Commissioner Balch stated that at its recent meeting, the Parks and Recreation Commission <br />considered an information item regarding small - animal farm on the Bernal Property. He <br />inquired if this was an item that would come before the Planning Commission in any regard. <br />Mr. Weinstein stated that he was not familiar with this specific issue or its background but <br />indicated that the Planning Division is oftentimes involved in park projects even if they do not <br />require Planning Division approval or permit. <br />Commissioner Ritter noted that the Planning Commission would see it if it required a zoning <br />change. <br />Ms. Seto said that was correct. She explained that the proposal would go forward as long as it <br />is consistent with the Bernal Park Master Plan. She indicated, however, that if part of the <br />proposal for the small - animal farm included a small building requiring design approval at the <br />staff level, the Planning Division would review the proposal; and if it involved a significant <br />building, it may have to go through Planning Commission review. She noted that with a lot of <br />issues that went forward with the Bernal Park in terms of voter approval, it would very difficult to <br />change something significant out there. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW /ACTION /INFORMATION <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />b. Actions of the City Council <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 8, 2014 Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.