My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081314
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 081314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:19:41 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:14:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/13/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
upscale home. She indicated that Mr. Schmitt has recently visited her home to view the <br />story poles, and while they may not agree on the extent of the impact of the proposed <br />remodel on her home, they can agree that it is difficult to find a solution that works. She <br />noted that the Schmitts have been good neighbors and that she hopes they can arrive <br />at a mutually satisfactory solution. She pointed out that staff recommends two options <br />for the Commission's consideration and that she supports either option. She then <br />sincerely thanked the Commissioners for their time and attention. <br />Daniella Karo stated that she has been a resident of Pleasanton since 1968. She <br />indicated that she and her husband worked at the Lawrence Livermore National <br />Laboratory then, and they decided that Pleasanton would be a good place for them. <br />She noted that they were among the first two or three people who came to Rose Point <br />and that they liked the area specifically compared with the valley for the fact that all of <br />these homes were supposed to be one -story homes on relatively large lots, which <br />guaranteed that they would have privacy in building there. She added that they did <br />have some CC &Rs which may have expired at some point, and she does not <br />understand why they were allowed to expire. <br />Ms. Karo stated that she personally experienced the same thing that Ms. Bengtson is <br />going through. She indicated that she lives in a cul -de -sac, and in the early 2000's, her <br />next -door neighbors decided to build a second -story addition, which they did not agree <br />with. She stated that she went around the neighborhood asking neighbors how they felt <br />about it, and they gathered a lot of signatures from those who were completely against <br />the second -story addition. She noted that what ultimately happened was that her <br />wonderful next -door neighbor was very sensitive to the way the neighborhood felt about <br />the addition and how their quality of life and the value of their homes were going to be <br />impacted, and decided to withdraw the application for a second story and built a very <br />lovely extension on one -story level surrounding the swimming pool area, which they are <br />very happy about. <br />Ms. Karo stated that she also suffered the effects of a second -story addition that went <br />up right behind her lot and which went up literally overnight during the summer when <br />most of the neighbors were vacationing. She indicated that they were not given any <br />advanced notice that this was going to happen, and the second story was already up <br />there when she came back from vacation. She noted that this created a great uproar in <br />the neighborhood. She added that the house, as it is built right now, does not fit in the <br />neighborhood, and she is still fighting to keep privacy from the impact of that second <br />story. She urged the Commission to maintain the quality and ambience of Rose Point, <br />which is primarily a single -story neighborhood. She indicated that she knows, with an <br />aging population, that there is a great need for second stories, but that whatever <br />increasing value that goes to the next -door neighbor's addition of a second story will <br />negatively impact the value of the houses neighboring that change. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 13, 2014 Page 7 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.