Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Weinstein stated that until the 1980's, the Zoning Ordinance did not require a design <br />review process for single - family residential additions, which might account for some of <br />the discrepancies between the City's building permit records and what was built in that <br />neighborhood. <br />Chair O'Connor stated that he was assuming that because the CC &Rs prohibited <br />second - stories when they were initially written, the six homes must have added their <br />second - stories at a later time. <br />Ms. Wallis replied that could be the case <br />Commissioner Allen stated that she was out on the property yesterday and it appears <br />like the existing second -story homes are not on Hamilton Way but at the very back or at <br />the court, around the perimeter of this development. She asked staff if that was correct. <br />Ms. Wallis confirmed that there are no second -story homes on Hamilton Way and that <br />Commissioner Allen's assumption would be valid based on the map. <br />As a follow -up to Commissioner Ritter's question on precedents and how second stories <br />were handled in the past, Commissioner Allen noted that the staff report states that <br />there were two occasions in the past 20 years where owners did come forward with <br />proposals to build a second story and those were deferred. She asked staff to clarify <br />what did happen when these proposals had come forward and what the resolution was. <br />Ms. Wallis replied that in the first case in 1999, the application went all the way to the <br />Planning Commission as well as to the City Council, and the City Council continued the <br />item and directed the applicant and neighbors to try and resolve the issue. She <br />indicated that the applicant never came back, and no single -story or two -story addition <br />was ever constructed on that home. <br />Ms. Wallis continued that the second proposal in the 2000's was likewise appealed all <br />the way up to the City Council. She explained that one Councilmember was absent, <br />and because the vote was a 2 -2 split, the item was continued to a future meeting. She <br />indicated that prior to the second City Council meeting, the applicant withdrew the <br />application so no final decision was ever reached either. She added that at that point, <br />the applicant came back and voluntarily submitted for a single -story addition. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired if there are any view easements in this area. <br />Ms. Wallis replied that she is not aware of any. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Greg Munn, Principal of Design Tech Associates, representing the applicants, stated <br />that he was hired by the Schmitts to design an addition and remodel to their home. He <br />indicated that he had heard a little bit about the underlying issues regarding two -story <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 13, 2014 Page 4 of 32 <br />