My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081314
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 081314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:19:41 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:14:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/13/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dolan replied that then it gets complicated because if the City does not have the <br />inventory that is zoned properly at the cut -off date, then the City gets into this by -right <br />situation, which the City is desperately trying to avoid. He explained that if the City does <br />not have its inventory in order at the time it is due for submittal, which is by January 31, <br />2015, then all the projects on those sites that were promised to be rezoned later will fall <br />into this by -right situation, and the City loses a lot of its discretion to get the type of <br />projects that it want. He noted that in the last RHNA cycle, that was something the City <br />worked very hard at trying to control with the development standards and the design <br />guidelines. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired, for example, if the Plan as written today is submitted to HCD, <br />and HCD indicates that one or more of the sites are not viable, which would result in the <br />City not meeting its numbers, if HCD would give the City time to come back and revise <br />its report or does that get the projects automatically into the by -right situation. <br />Ms. Wallis replied that the City does not get extra time; the City has to certify the <br />document by January 31, 2015, and HCD then has 90 days from that date to certify it. <br />She indicated that this is the reason why staff had tried throughout this process to build <br />in a little bit of cushion. <br />Chair O'Connor asked if, for example, should this one property in particular be removed, <br />and HCD finds that the City was viable on everything but was short by less than <br />200 units, the City could come back and include this already rezoned site into the <br />document. <br />Mr. Dolan said yes; Council's direction to do the rezoning can be reversed. He stated <br />that that is probably what the City would do because a decision was made to take it out, <br />but it ends up not working and it needs to be put back in the inventory. He added that <br />HCD would then change its decision when the City actually brings the rezoning forward. <br />Ms. Wallis explained that after Council authorizes submittal to HCD, HCD has 60 -day <br />review period, after which the City will be provided with comments based on that review <br />She indicated that the City will then need to come back and analyze those comments <br />and make whatever fundamental changes are required to meet those comments. She <br />added that it will then come back to the City in December or January for certification of <br />those changes, then returned to HCD for final certification. <br />Commissioner Allen commented that the City then has some flexibility. <br />Commissioner Piper stated that all the questions raised were great and that she does <br />not have any further comments. <br />Commissioner Allen thanked all the folks from a lot of different neighborhoods who took <br />the time to come out tonight and share their input because that is what the public <br />process is all about. She noted that there are a lot of faces she has never seen before, <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 13, 2014 Page 28 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.